NetBase Quid Reviews

3.8

61% would recommend to a friend

(64 total reviews)

Anthony Lye

49% approve of CEO

43% positive business outlook

NetBase Quid has an employee rating of 3.8 out of 5 stars, based on 64 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The NetBase Quid employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Information Technology industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

64 reviews
1.0
10 Aug 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Some of the most intelligent, creative and kind teammates I’ve had the pleasure of working alongside - Interesting work using an effective and intuitive platform

Cons

I joined NetBase Quid with high hopes, drawn in by the promise of a people-first culture and the prospect of thriving in a cutting-edge AI and tech environment. However, the last year of my role has been completely soured by top leadership and I’m left with a full lack of trust or hope in the future of this company as an industry leader. The lack of transparency and leadership’s attitude surrounding recent layoffs has distinctly impacted team morale and culture. There was a significant void in open and honest communication about reasons or unmet goals leading to layoffs, leaving many employees feeling blindsided and uncertain about the future. This lack of clarity has eroded trust and made it difficult to understand the company's direction – other than an unspoken, but VERY clear message that sales is highly prioritized above all other company functions. The aftermath of layoffs has led to an increased workload for those who remain and opportunities for skill development and career advancement that were once emphasized now seem distant, unattainable and frankly, uninspiring given recent events. While restructuring can of course be necessary in difficult economic times, leadership’s absurd response (e.g., complete disregard of events and pitiful excuse for an acknowledgement of impacts) has led to burnout and severely decreased job satisfaction as we struggle to see the light ahead. The loss of exceptionally talented individuals, who were proven to have contributed greatly to the company's success, has left a void that leadership has not adequately addressed or even appropriately acknowledged, with leadership’s only message that it’s important to “keep moving forward and focusing on growth” despite over a 30% decrease (!!!!) in workforce this year. Incentives and benefits have overall been slowly stripped from employees as well (e.g., PTO suddenly shifted to accrual to avoid company payout for a dwindling workforce; wellness, travel and other stipends cut; contractual bonuses cut, but only for certain teams; a 2% 401k match that has not budged in 15 years). Leadership has also brushed anticipated promotion cycles under the rug, basically saying anything to avoid saying “ they’re not in the cards for a while”. Employees can’t help but feel deeply devalued and unmotivated to keep striving and grinding, as incredibly hard work and dedication, loyalty and commitment of exceptional teams are not reciprocated or even met with acknowledgement or understanding. The “response” to failing morale has been marked by a lack of guidance and even deeper lack of empathy from leadership. Leadership refuses to take ownership or any sort of active role in addressing plummeting morale, suggesting teammates “lean on each other” to get through increasing workloads, critical teammates gone with no notice and a complete strip of employee incentives that previously helped inspire continued above-and-beyond work. The complete lack of ownership or support from leadership has leveled any remaining morale as teams who have consistently been on the ‘chopping block’ for layoffs have been outright neglected or met with defensive / combative responses from “people-first” leaders when sharing our concerns and experiences. Leadership offers a “listening ear”, but downright refuses against all odds to hear the message employees are trying to share. Instead of addressing questions and worries with empathy, openness and mutual solutioning, they have resorted to self-preservation through manipulation of questions to save face and push their own agenda, leaving employees feeling even more unheard and unsupported. As a result of the unsettling turn this company has taken in the last several months especially, I fear that NetBase Quid will continue to experience a loss of exceptional talent and trust. The company's failure to address these concerns and its clear and palpable disregard for employee well-being / experience only serve to perpetuate a cycle of declining morale and a weakened work environment. There is absolutely no culture left in some facets of this business, other than sheer anger and frustration. It's my hope that NetBase Quid will urgently reassess its approach to employee relations and communication. You can support your employees while making difficult decisions – that’s what it means to be an effective leader. I implore leadership to reflect on these issues and take immediate and meaningful steps towards rebuilding trust, transparency, and a genuinely supportive working environment – not just touting one on paper. - Read above - No HR department - Severely disconnected leadership - Lack of growth opportunities and incentives - Noncompetitive pay

avatar
NetBase Quid Response
2y
Thank you for taking the time to write a review and I agree that NetBase Quid has many intelligent, creative and kind colleagues, and an innovative platform powered by cutting-edge AI. I would welcome the opportunity discuss your feedback and have a thoughtful dialogue. I can be reached at sbertram@netbase.com. Regardless, I wish you the very best moving forward. Take care, Seujan Bertram (Chief Operating Officer, NetBase Quid)
1.0
26 Oct 2023

Borderline incompetent management

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

*The people - most of the people I worked with were simply amazing in their commitment to the company, their work, and the aspirations they had for really helping customers. *The technology - pretty cool tech under the surface in its ability to aggregate and derive insights from so much data. *Customers - the best customers in looking to drive their businesses forward with insights and analytics derived from continuously changing events and data. So many just terrfic successes they had in using the technology to make a difference for their companies as well as build thei own careers. Account management team - just terrific all the things they did to help customers, not enough room on this form to list them.

Cons

*Management - bordeline incompetent. So many business, product, and market mistakes, so many naval gazing decisions, no new ideas. A long list of folks that should have retired or moved to somewhere else a long time ago. A President and COO who every day do more damage to what's left of the company. *Culture - non existent, no investment in the people that actually do all the work, a remote work environment for cost savings purposes only, platitudes from the COO which turned into nothing. But, in reflection the COO, simply didn't have the experience and or skills for the job they were asked to do. *Product - just keeps falling behind. The product from the NLP and UI continues to suffer from under investment and slow decision making. It simply doesn't pass the eye test when compared to the two main competitors. Example the Quid networking technology is 10 yrs old, and is no longer differentiating. So many better examples in the market. *Engineering Resources - great people, really great people. But, for a very long time the decision to have an engineering team in Taiwan was based on costs and cost savings and nothing else. There was a very low expectation of pace of innovation and with each release their was always more bug fixes than actual features. Too many times in which a new release simply did not meet the customers needs. Which made account management so much harder.

avatar
NetBase Quid Response
2y
While I respect that your review is based on your personal situation, I would welcome a dialogue to better the understand your feedback and can be reached at sbertram@quid.com. Regardless, I wish you the very best moving forward. Take care, Seujan Bertram Chief Operating Officer
2.0
5 Sept 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Good product relative to competitors (though this category is not mission critical for most companies) - Had many great team members - No one micromanaging. Unfortunately there was not a lot of work, so you had a good amount of free time (double edged sword)

Cons

Over my significant time at the company I held several different roles so I was very familiar with how individual teams worked. Overall, while individual teams often had great people, most (not all) leaders of each individual organization focused only on their own teams (often arbitrary) metrics to appease goals set by leadership. What this meant is that each team essentially looked at each other as adversaries instead of teammates. This attitude essentially rots the entire organization to the core, so unless there is a ground up reorganization this company will not succeed. Over my tenure, there were phases where there was some increased morale. Namely, after Quid was integrated and after some supremely toxic SVP level folks left, the company brought in some good outside leadership. Unfortunately, the shakeups weren't enough to push through significant changes. The increased spend to attempt to be a better company was short lived, resulting in multiple rounds of layoffs, then a return to the cheap, morale killing methods of years past. The most significant problem, however, is that no one in leadership truly takes ownership and as such, this rolls down hill. The new people that want to come in and make a difference are soon ground down to mediocrity, because being the best doesnt matter. Have great ideas? Youll get on a call with leadership, they will nod and say "great idea!" then nothing will happen. Even if you try to tackle the project by yourself, you will spend more meetings trying to convince other team leaders why its a good idea, only for them to put up roadblocks and make your life difficult. You still want to take ownership? It actually worked? Don't worry, You wont get paid more, you wont get promoted and you wont get any real recognition/movement/earnings that motivate you. There is a level of apathy that I have never seen at any other organization. So yeah, I got what I could out of it but glad I got laid off. Theres way better opportunities out there for myself and my talented ex-colleagues.

avatar
NetBase Quid Response
2y
Thank you for taking the time to write a review and I agree that we have a great product and the company is filled with high quality team members. While I respect that your review is based on your personal situation, I would welcome a dialogue to better understand your feedback and can be reached at sbertram@netbase.com. Regardless, I wish you the very best moving forward. Take care, Seujan Bertram Chief Operating Officer
Viewing 1 - 3 of 64 Reviews

Glassdoor has 71 NetBase Quid reviews submitted anonymously by NetBase Quid employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if NetBase Quid is right for you.