Instructure Reviews

3.3

55% would recommend to a friend

(833 total reviews)
avatar

Steve Daly

43% approve of CEO

37% positive business outlook

Instructure has an employee rating of 3.3 out of 5 stars, based on 833 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Instructure employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Information Technology industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

833 reviews
1.0
18 Dec 2020

TB Kills

Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Many amazing coworkers that are will now be lifelong friends. To be fair, I did get paychecks.

Cons

TL;DR: Understaffed, overworked, underpaid. "Leadership" only cares about money. The lack of care for their employees borders on disdain. Employees are completely dispensable. Instructure has been going downhill over the last few years. That slow downhill turned into a 100 foot cliff with the combination of Thoma Bravo taking over and COVID-19/lockdown hitting. They have laid off hundreds of people across all departments this year, seemingly by looking at numbers on a spreadsheet. There was no regard to how valuable those people were to their departments and the company as a whole. I have no proof, but it sure looks like it was because many of those people made too much money. Because of this, the products have suffered. Some critical engineering teams are down to literally two people. Stock options were taken away with no replacement program. Insurance premiums used to be paid by the company, but that was taken away. In 2021, premiums will technically be reimbursed in the form of bonuses or HSA contributions. After 2021, those bonuses/HSA contributions will not continue. For people with families, this is effectively a $500+/month pay cut. Business went up 500+% because of COVID-19, but staffing in Support stayed the same. Full time L1 agents who have been lost to attrition have been replaced by part time agents, presumably so that TB doesn't have to provide benefits. This means that there are far fewer experienced L1 agents, which is a bad for the customer. It is also bad for the supervisors, L2s and other experienced agents who do not have the bandwidth to properly help/train/mentor all the new employees. Of course, this is also bad for those new employees who are not given the knowledge or tools necessary to do their job properly. Since staffing did not increase, the workload for L1s and L2s has skyrocketed. In the midst of fall start, turnaround times for many L1 tickets went from 1 hour (for the best SLA agreement) to a month. L1s have been on back-to-back calls and chats for almost a year with no lulls. There are no scheduled breaks or lunches, so everyone feels chained to their desks. This worked out okay when Instructure was smaller and there was some down time where people could get up and walk around for a minute. That doesn't work so well now and it feels barbaric. Management tells L1s to take plenty of breaks. They are also told they can take a 30 minute lunch if they clock out, but I've never personally seen that happen. Everyone is kind of shamed into being where they are supposed to be. I have personally felt guilty for going to the bathroom, even when it was urgent. When I started, the goal of a first contact resolution was the priority. Now, only ticket numbers and SLA matter (even though SLA times have largely been unachievable, due to the unsustainable volume). With more business and more inexperienced L1s, turnaround time for tickets escalated to L2 agents shot up to nearly 2 months. Imagine depending on a decent internet connection for your job. Then imagine your internet breaks and Xfinity doesn't get back to you for a MONTH or TWO. You would drop them without hesitation. "Leadership" has been blaming COVID-19 for the failure to scale to customer demand. That excuse is nonsense now that this has been going on for almost a year now. Historically, weathering busy semester starts has been tolerable since December, May, June and July used to be fairly slow. This year, that has not been the case at all. The decline in contact volume since August has been relatively small. There certainly isn't enough staffing to handle the current volume, so everyone, in all levels of Support, is completely burned out and demoralized. The workload for L2s is currently not even close to being caught up. It will carry over into the 2021 spring semester, where the nightmare will increase in intensity again. (I was going to say "...the nightmare will start all over again" but that would suggest that it stopped at some point.) Management thanks its employees with, "Thank you for all your hard work in these trying times." and a couple $5 Amazon gift cards. Nothing meaningful has been done to compensate the employees for the abuse Thoma Bravo has put them through over the last year. I do think that Support managers and (most) supervisors genuinely care about their employees. Unfortunately, they can only do so much. Their hands are tied by "leadership". Work/life balance no longer exists. This job has consumed me. My mental health has suffered. I don't normally suffer from depression, but I have been depressed for months. I had the first panic attack of my life. I'm self-medicating every day. My spouse misses the old me. Thoma Bravo truly is evil. Greed always wins and the little people always lose.

2.0
6 Jun 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

There are some amazing people. I’ve found people I call my friends today, I met people I call my mentors. I’ve learned a lot. I would even say that many of the changes have been dealt with pretty well. Acquisition. Private. IPO. Many layoffs. The perks are not bad, standard for a tech company. For a while it did seem like a great company to work for & I didn’t have too many complaints to be quite frank.

Cons

Now this is where it gets interesting. Let’s start with career progression. This really depends on the team you’re in & who your line manager is. Which is good in theory, but not standardized across the business. The problem is, that there is a lot of favoritism and a lot of people concern themselves with questions like “If I promote this person, then I need to also promote this other person”. Promotions should be based on skill set and capabilities. What ends up happening all the time within the marketing org: people get promoted without the required skills. Or people who have the skill sets don’t get promoted, because another person on the wider team can’t be promoted. Yeah. I don’t get it either, the decision making is made on a whim and without any business sense - just politics. Culturally, I’ve definitely seen a decline within the marketing team. Collaboration and transparency are promoted as the main pillars of Instructure’s culture, but there’s been a shift towards petty behavior and gossiping in the last year. I’m not sure if this is just because I’ve been exposed to it more and it always existed, or if this toxicity is a new development. There are cliques and if you are not a pushover (meaning you speak your mind - which has been emphasized in endless All-Hands as one of the most important things Instructure wants to foster), then you are blacklisted or written off as a nuisance. If you don’t think certain people’s ideas are the best thing since sliced bread, well then… you should probably leave because no good word will be spoken about you by some members of the marketing leadership team. The audacity of some people in the leadership team goes far - the communication is ridiculously bad. Most team members are not involved in hiring (even if someone will be reporting into you - you just get informed that you are now managing a person that’s not even necessarily the most qualified choice), no communication around targets, nonsensical suggestions of career progression (or sometimes even stating that your career will just not progress, and that they really can’t help you), making ridiculous monetary suggestions that then turn out to be nothing, gossiping about you to other team members in a public forum - the list goes on and on. The root of the problem is that some members of the marketing leadership team seem to only be concerned with how they look in front of the exec staff, leading to rash decisions in “panic mode”, without thinking of the consequences for anyone else. There’s no longer really a concern for employee well-being. It’s mainly about damage control, gossiping & trying to keep face. This is pretty sad, because I used to respect many of these people. I always thought Instructure was a great place, with good people. Now I’m witnessing the development of a toxic company culture, which drives many away from the business.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 833 Reviews

Glassdoor has 904 Instructure reviews submitted anonymously by Instructure employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Instructure is right for you.