Goede arbeidsvoorwaarden, matig management - Marketeer Randstad Employee Review

2.0
2 Mar 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Mensgericht - Goede secundaire arbeidsvoorwaarden en als je goed onderhandelt goede primaire voorwaarden

Cons

- Middle management is vooral gericht op eigen carriere. Kijkt mede daardoor erg naar korte termijn en zijn ook zo weer weg als er ergens anders (vaak binnen het bedrijf) een beter baan is. Daardoor ook regelmatig managers die onvoldoende kunnen managen. - marketingstrategie wijzigt om de paar jaar, begint de strategie eindelijk een beetje te werken, wordt er alweer vanaf gestapt. Nu wordt getracht agile te werken, maar het schiet het doel voorbij: scrummen is het doel geworden. Op sommige gebieden werkt het gewoon onvoldoende (een andere werkwijze had meer opgeleverd) maar dat wordt niet toegegeven.

Explore other reviews about Randstad

5.0
27 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Loved my team. My Manager was incredibly supportive, understand, and always rooting for myself as well as my teammate's success. Remote work was highly flexible and accommodating.

Cons

Pay was a little low and you don't get paid for holidays in your probationary period but there's growth opportunities after 6 months of employment.

1.0
27 Apr 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Recruiter was responsive at first, and the team I spoke with at the client company seemed professional and genuinely kind.

Cons

Here’s a more detailed “Cons” you can use and tweak: Cons: I went all the way through onboarding for a contract role, spent a full day last week chasing down and uploading sensitive documents (including my passport), and was told I’d be starting this week. Then, at the last minute, I got a single text saying I “didn’t pass” a third‑party ID check — with no explanation of what supposedly failed and no formal notice or report to review. As an American citizen using a valid passport, it’s really disturbing to have a job pulled over an opaque automated screening and to be told “other factors” were flagged without anyone willing or able to say what they were. Even after repeatedly asking, I was given no more than a generic privacy policy and bounced between contacts, which feels extremely careless with my time, my livelihood, and the very private identity data they collected. Best‑practice guidance for background checks says candidates should get clear written notice and a chance to understand or dispute issues before a job is taken away; that absolutely did not happen here.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All