Pros
+Some teams are compensated well. +/- There's some job flexibility (though that diminished after a RTO mandate for a few offices). + There are really cool and smart people still at TripleLift (for now).
Cons
What a dark road we've been on. What was once a vibrant, fairly happy company culture has so quickly tanked under the new leadership -- without revenue to show for it. The only profitability we can boast is that which came from cutting resources, leaving teams lean and over-worked without the tools and resources they need to be effective. Our execs' idea of culture seems to be bringing out pastries once a week, hugging the three people they like, and implying that if you’ve been at this company for over three years you simply miss the founders — therefore, any critique you have of their leadership must be firmly negated. While it’s true many of us miss having a CEO whose approval rating on Glassdoor had never fallen into the 20s, the reason isn’t just because our founder-CEO had a better personality and was more fun (true, but really not a requirement for company growth). It’s because our founders had created a culture where people generally liked to go to work and were allowed to share their opinions without fear of losing their jobs, and decisions were made that actually led to revenue growth and profitability. Call me crazy, but people like to be at companies where they feel appreciated and can actually see clear company growth, ensuring job stability and a future in what can be a sometimes rocky industry. This set of execs is bleeding talent, and that talent cared about the company and had deep institutional knowledge. That said, when people with institutional knowledge leave it chips further away at public memory, which is a boon to some of these execs who can now quite openly rewrite history and run from accountability. It’s a neat trick, but it’s not particularly sustainable for the business. A fairly unpopular return to office mandate has simply made it easier than ever for disgruntled employees to tell each other how deeply unhappy they are, and how often they're looking for new jobs. Of course, the execs seem to be happy or indifferent whenever people leave, but who will be left? Meanwhile, HR sugarcoats the results of our 48% engagement score. I know, HR is never a friend of the people, but HR isn't supposed to increase risk to company profitability either. What I mean by this is the engagement score showcases how deeply unhappy we are, and unhappy employees are not profitable employees, and perhaps HR should be working with the leadership on real solutions instead of just telling us on company-wide calls how not so bad it is. Any leader worth their salt would know to do that. TripleLift hired smart people, and smart people see what's going on, so let's not insult our intelligence further by trying to imply we simply don't understand what's happening to our company.