employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Tata Research Development and Design Centre

Is this your company?

Tata Research Development and Design Centre Reviews

4.1

74% would recommend to a friend

(81 total reviews)

55% positive business outlook

Tata Research Development and Design Centre has an employee rating of 4.1 out of 5 stars, based on 81 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an excellent working experience there.

Reviews by job title

81 reviews
2.0
14 Jun 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

My current location allows for flexi-timings, we can come in casuals and just need to finish the given work in given time, which is not impossible. One may have a very good stay/time if they are good at impressing boss with faulty/incomplete results or if one could get to work on what they want to and keep impressing boss. Of course, most(~95%) of the workers in my group are all IITians and IIScians. Decent pay cheque, sufficient to live decently. Top-most management expects a NOBEL PRIZE from this group.

Cons

No good research in most of the scientific areas being pursued, no mission/vision by senior management; impress the boss with "jugaads" or "covered up" incomplete works or mindless-proactive behaviour; no rewards for real workers; no appreciation if you are not trying to impress the boss with fast and impressive results; no thorough evaluation of employees, some remain very good in the eyes of boss throughout their stay while some remain bad, so no promotions/perks and bad ratings. No encouragement for real research, research is driven by the shrunk-mind knowledge of bosses rather than a vision, no boss is willing to try a new idea given by researchers; ideas by seniors (even if the idea is not worthy) or bosses alone are considered. No time accounted for ideation. Ignorance is bliss to some bosses, they applaud every minute thing in a scientific area which they like, they thwart every thing in an area which they don't like. High degree of biasing based on visual aesthetics alone like polished looks of unprofessional work, colourful presentations, good manners only in front of boss, great news in personal life; no value to details or correctness of research, improper mentoring. Very shrunk mindset, and no spirit of research. Poorly knowledgeable bosses, who give wrong directions in research and force the researchers to follow, finally blame researchers for the failures and give bad ratings, although the researchers were sure about the success in paths under consideration, yet no corrective actions on such bosses. Very pathetic work ethics and research attitude, only namesake or brand reminding research but not real research of any consequence to the needs of world. Most of the times, even if projects are useless, researchers are either forced to pursue the project or threatened to quit the research/company, just because boss spawned the idea for the project, however irrelevant/implausible/unworthy the idea is. Some projects are never-ending. Unfortunately, the research in this fashion is pursued without questioning the relevance, by the researchers in my division who are all IITians and IIScians. Very less experimental facilities, without which no credible research output can be made, as most computational research are trusted in scientific community only upon validations. Poor collaborations with outside world for experiments. Very low basic pay in the salary. This is very deceiving, because over 5years of service in TCS, one cannot make a decent corpus in ProvidentFund and pension schemes, while a mere technician or substaff in government labs make more than double the corpus as ours, in same ProvidentFund and pension schemes for same time. So, unadvisable for the ones who strongly consider piling up a corpus for post-retirement use. Relocation is impossible for researchers in core scientific domains. A very bad place for the capable people, because your hands are either tied or your attempts are thwarted due to wrong mentoring of shrunk-minded unprofessional bosses. So, basically, the research spirit itself is destroyed. Top-most management expects a NOBEL PRIZE from this group, which has the attributes as listed above.

3.0
26 Nov 2018

Change hiring matrices

Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Very flexible working hours, no formals nothing Just work enough to meet the deadlines.

Cons

The way TCS distinguishes candidates based on their institutional affiliations is just not right. I mean a candidate can be from an XTZ college but that does not mean that he is any less competent than a guy from an IIT. I have seen IITians failing here miserably and a guy from a private engineering college is doing niche stuff. Another thing that troubles me a lot is based on this TCS offers way more salary to the candidates belonging to institutions graded as A by TCS. I think an employer should look for the skills a candidate has not the institution he belongs to. Another very sensitive issue that I observed during my stint at TRDDC is many people here are tagged to the role of a scientist. They do not even justify that role. Forget about writing code. No technical inputs, no algorithmic improvement suggestions, just be present at the meetings and shouting (gently) at peers. This is the one becomes a "Scientist"? Literally LOL!

4.0
12 May 2025

Good, but at a cost

Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great work-life balance Research work seldom has client deliverables, so there are very few hectic days TCS has good health insurance schemes No competition or politics majorly for promotion/hike. There's a fairly established process. Most folks get 8% hike per year, and promotion from researcher to scientist takes 5 years. Easygoing, chill life Good place if you want to do a PhD later. Many internal pathways too. Feels like a bunch of class toppers coming together to recreate academic research vibe (well...) Most people in the office are happy. Occasional collabs with colleges and all. Intern projects are very college-friendly, in terms of adjusting deadlines, creating submit-worthy reports, managers filling college forms. WFO 5 days a week, but timings are not as strict. Dress code is also relaxed. Depends on manager though.

Cons

Office reeks of entitlement. Everyone believes they are superior because they are doing "Research". Dude, chill, it's just another job. Senior management runs projects on personal whims. They have choice of projects to take up. A lot of IIT and non-IITian ego drama, nothing toxic culture, but subtle discrimination & gatekeeping is the norm Projects keep coming up, and getting shelved. They don't see the light of the day. No client deliverables, so your manager sort of decides when a project is done. And the outcomes, well he decides that too. People used to write papers and travel to conferences, if manager is good. Now, its drastically reduced. The "research = divine" arrogance is high. The whole office is senior-heavy (read 40-50+), young employees have little voice in anything - projects, hiring or anything important. It's a great place to relax, and enjoy a dettached ivory tower existence.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 81 Reviews

Glassdoor has 121 Tata Research Development and Design Centre reviews submitted anonymously by Tata Research Development and Design Centre employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Tata Research Development and Design Centre is right for you.