Migrant Help Reviews

4.1

68% would recommend to a friend

(33 total reviews)

88% positive business outlook

Migrant Help has an employee rating of 4.1 out of 5 stars, based on 33 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an excellent working experience there.

Reviews by job title

33 reviews
2.0
15 Feb 2022

Where do I start

Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Some nice people, sadly following a strict system

Cons

- Expected to take a call straight after one another - Breaks are scheduled, because the migrants cant wait ( queue is always full ) - Low pay - £20k as of 09/21, was £18k before - Call structure, there is no caseworking here, your meant to follow a script. A signposting service with a few things you can do. Thats fine but there are complicated issues here - 25 calls a day with avergae handling time of 12 mins is the target, i prefer to actually help the customer - If god help you take a minute off between calls your always spied upon, asked “ You Ok ?” - Only paid after your shift by going 15 mins over on a call, which you have to inform your TL, but dont you dare be one minute late signing on - Clueless approach to a work/life balance

2.0
28 Apr 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The company provided some activities and medical support for those seeking asylum. Most employees were nice and welcoming. Good pension.

Cons

The work was not satisfying and the whole place operated like a factory. I worked in the London (Croydon Office) and clients (what we called those seeking asylum) were not treated with compassion and support. I understand the job was tricky with some difficult aspects to it but I found the client. advisors and management were always trying to simply meet targets and send people along without properly addressing their needs. I understand that his comes from a higher level, however the focus on targets and how many people we dispersed in a day meant that the work was not meaningful and the support given to those seeking asylum was superficial at best. As a result clients were often distressed. In addition, there were always confrontations in the office and it never felt like a safe place. On the HR and employee life side of things I had a terrible time with one particular employee who had the same job title as me, who instantly took a dislike to me. She was meant to train me but refused to do so and acted very annoyed when I asked for help. In some occasions she even bullied me and left me in tears and I had to go to management. Instead of taking it seriously, they showed some concern, but then said that this was just her personality and that they had problems with her before. After two months I decided I had enough andI found a new job, so I must say that when I finally left they genuinely did try to keep me and that is when they. took the bullying claims more seriously. However, I no. longer wanted to stay. in that work environment,

2.0
8 Jul 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Worked 8 hr shifts between 0800-2000hrs, usually 0800-1600hrs and 1200-2000hrs. As a Team Leader every day was different and my team I managed were enthusiastic and helpful/ The culture of targets there is understandable as working to KPIs for the Home Office for which they receive a lot of funding through contracts. Working in the EAGL department there was the usual call centre expectations and time monitoring. My line manager was approachable and the Head of Centre (who has now left) was very supportive . The workload is too high in particular for Team Leaders and causes a lot of stress. It also results in doing unpaid work on both evenings and weekends in order to try to keep up with everything that is expected. . This noticeably became worse when Team Leaders were expected to do an hour of inbound each day, this just conflicted with other things which were also a priority such as dealing with complaints. It also sadly felt that other departments looked down upon EAGL, an example when clarifying feedback from another department (Submissions) I received the curt and rude reply "Ask your manager". That was it and I think that is incredibly unprofessional. Another example of this is a feedback log between EAGL and Submissions, I was under the impression that feedback should be two way, sadly in this case it felt like continual criticism of EAGL advisors who are under immense pressure. There is a very high turnover of staff and this needs to be dealt with urgently. Along with giving the trainers the time to get on with training rather than being pulled continually away to other tasks. This is not fair on the training staff and not fair on new employees. The Hardest part of the job was the keeping up with the competing demands and workload - the workforce has grown exponentially at Migrant Help other the last few years, and it doesn't feel like the processes have been updated in order to accommodate it. The positive thing about the role was helping someone in genuine need. - Pros Location for travel, No Night Shifts other than on call for volunteers, Non Contributory Pension

Cons

Far too few staff, unrealistic expectations, Insufficient remuneration for work done.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 33 Reviews

Glassdoor has 35 Migrant Help reviews submitted anonymously by Migrant Help employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Migrant Help is right for you.