IAC Reviews

3.5

54% would recommend to a friend

(286 total reviews)
avatar

Joey Levin

72% approve of CEO

47% positive business outlook

IAC has an employee rating of 3.5 out of 5 stars, based on 286 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The IAC employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Information Technology industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

286 reviews
5.0
8 Jun 2017

To the trolls...

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great perks. Smart people. Lots of investment in people. You'll learn a lot about direct marketing. You'll sharpen your analytical skills.

Cons

Dining options in Yonkers are limited.

2.0
2 Sept 2016

For IAC Applications only - Poor senior management team

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Decent work life balance with summer Fridays and xmas shutdowns. Beautiful office. Decent perks overall. Individuals from directors and below are generally good people that want to do best for the business.

Cons

Senior management. The co-CEOs, I believe, want to foster a culture of accountability but it devolves into a culture of blame. Meetings with them would be held with the intention of public shaming instead of group problem solving. Poisonous culture where individuals don't feel protected. Only those individuals willing to take undeserved credit and blame others for mistakes thrive. Recently, a new CFO has been installed that fit that mode. The CFO is a perfect example of senior management style at IACA. Poor management skills, blames other for his deficiencies, engages in activities that generates limited values, and very low EQ. That hire alone is responsible for the departure of several individuals include the team he inherited.

1.0
23 Apr 2008
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Ask.com is (was?) a well-respected brand in the Internet community. Ask released products that often were regarded as even superior to our big competitor Google's and it felt good to be part of that. Many people saw us as the David vs. Google's Goliath and everybody seems to like a good underdog story. That has since changed with the firing of CEO Jim Lanzone. The new top management did a 180 degree turn and wants to remake Ask into a brand for house wives, which has many employees miffed. Other reasons to work there are a few of the perks typical for Internet companies, e.g. free sodas, game room, free breakfast on Tue (although admittedly that pales in comparison to what some of our competitors offer). Also, as the only major Internet brand located in the East Bay, it may be a good choice for those living there, who want to work in this industry but don't want to commute to Silicon Valley or San Francisco. (this applies to Ask.com, one subsidiary of IAC)

Cons

IAC does not have a leader figure with a passionate founder spirit like Google's Sergey Page and Larry Brin, Facebook's Mark Zuckerberg or Yahoo's Jerry Yang. The IAC head, Barry Diller, sits far away from "the action" in New York, does not understand the Internet industry very well with his TV background, and is more concerned about his own wealth than anything else. He was the 3rd-highest paid American CEO in 2007, took home $300 million, all the while IAC stock was tanking throughout the entire year. Forbes gives him an efficiency rating of 177 on a 1-189 scale (189 being worst) and the NY Times crowned him America’s Laziest Man. Unfortunately, this has consequences down to the rank and file. You will suffer from erratic and impatient decisions, lack of resources where they are needed the most and lack of a coherent strategy for the various parts of IAC, which includes Ask.com, Evite, Match.com, Citysearch, the notorious Fun Web Products and others. (FunWebProducts with Zwinky, Smiley Central etc. is often labeled as spyware from stuffing bundled toolbars onto people's computers that they didn't ask for) It's a very top-heavy organization with lots of generals and few soldiers. That new Ask top management comes across as secretive and secluded. Since IAC is a conglomerate of bought companies, there are locations and employees scattered all over the place. And I don't mean strategically based branch offices, I mean small teams or even individuals working from home in random far-flung states and different time zones making meetings and information exchange difficult. The new Ask.com leadership introduced a new org structure with two competing arms, one to increase query volume, the other to increase revenue per query. It creates a lot of friction between the teams because the ways to achieve their respective goals often conflict. Along with the change in focus for Ask, away from Internet innovator more towards a question/answer site for housewives, employee moral is low and several key people left the company even after a big round of layoffs in March.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 286 Reviews

Glassdoor has 322 IAC reviews submitted anonymously by IAC employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if IAC is right for you.