Gigamon Reviews

3.4

54% would recommend to a friend

(507 total reviews)

Shane Buckley

61% approve of CEO

43% positive business outlook

Gigamon has an employee rating of 3.4 out of 5 stars, based on 507 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Gigamon employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Information Technology industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

507 reviews
1.0
3 Apr 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

3 Lunches in a week 401 match Average medical insurance TT table, GYM

Cons

I have been here at Gigamon since last 2 years and have seen it going to the ground day by day. Somebody posted a very detailed review about Gigamon a week back but unfortunately that is now deleted. It truly reflected epitome of Gigamon's work culture. I echo many of points it talked about. I have worked in few companies in bay area and east coast before coming to Gigamon but never has seen such a poor quality of architects/distinguished engineers that Gigamon has. They learnt an art of keeping upper management happy without owning and delivering anything on the ground. Question need to be asked to them is "how many people have you mentored in a year" and "how many people stop by you on daily basis to ask questions and seek help". Answer is NONE. Asking questions is not celebrated and disagreement is a big no no. If you shows your disapproval to any of their idea, you are finished and they will come after you. Most of the engineers have understood this non verbal agreement. First line managers are essentially like a line managers who has no power to make any decision and always in agreement with their bosses. They run their own agenda and work hard to please upper management on the cost of the team. Building a winning team concept is unheard of. To the team, they act as dis-abler and team get to be productive on days when they are not in the office. Engineers are supposed to provide status to multiple people in a day ..VFT, line manager, director and in some cases to program managers. Micro management has gone to next lever here. Management thinks engineers time is most dispensable and anybody can summon them for unaccountable time. Authority is celebrated. Teams work in silos and blame game across teams is common. Product management has no idea about the product road map. Many of good product manager's were laid off. Company laid off recently 15% of workforce and everybody is in fear that they could be next. Management is feeling more empowered and taking benefit of this fear environment and giving unreasonable goals to the team. Favoritism and nepotism is very common and people are very much aware of who is inner circle and who is not. Nothing to do with expertise and knowledge to succeed here. It is all about contacts. Promotion is based on who you know and how well you can talk. Mass exodus is happening.

1.0
11 Mar 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

We all used to LOVE this place and everything it stood for. The people were great and the culture was amazing. But the choice to take a lower selling price and especially to a Private Equity firm destroyed Gigamon inside and out. Please take a second to Google 'Elliot Group' acquisitions and see tons of articles about how each company turned out afterwards.

Cons

Gigamon Execs/Mgmt (and future prospects), PLEASE, take the time to read the reviews all from the last 6-9 months - people are crying out. Upper management is terrible, chasing the next buyout (which Elliot does) and have lost their souls. There is a mass exodus and the exits are only getting larger in number - trust me.

avatar
Gigamon Response
8y
Thank you for your feedback on this review. I would love to speak with you more regarding your concerns about Gigamon and what we can both do to make sure that our One Gigamon culture thrives as a private company. From my perspective, Gigamon has always been about the People, the Technology and the Opportunity. From a leadership team perspective, this has not changed. And, as we discussed at our Town Hall on Thursday, Innovation is key to our success. I hope we can connect!
1.0
30 Dec 2018

Avoid this place like the plaque

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Benefits are decent for a private company; Free catered lunch 3 times a week; Fully-stocked kitchen with snacks, coffee, tea, sodas and drinks; Yearly family event with company sponsored hotel stay

Cons

Engineering management and the technical talent pool is of abysmal quality. If you are in engineering, you will not learn any good technologies or skill-sets that are transferable outside of Gigamon. The technology stack is extremely outdated, old, and boring. Even older bureaucratic companies like HP, Cisco, Juniper, IBM, etc., have far more interesting things happening in engineering and better culture that one can learn and at least find beneficial for one's career. The company thinks it is a hip and hot security player in the market - but in reality is nothing more than a glorified packet broker. The company relies on its legacy solutions and hardware for revenue and is barely scraping through every quarter. It is struggling to grow or make a mark in the industry due to its poor software stack, complex fragmented solutions that are too difficult to deploy, and bad product management/marketing and engineering practices. The executive management and the technical leaders excel at consistently making bad strategic and people related decisions, poorly executing on revenue targets and baking overly complex products that do have much adoption in the market or translate into direct revenue. The company is essentially living in a bubble. Many employees obviously knew about the problems for a long time but stuck with the company for the money through RSUs and ESPPs. Of course everyone had a massive windfall during the IPO many years ago and the privatization event this year. As expected, once the stocks were liquidated and RSUs dried up, the exodus started and is continuing since there is no more incentive to put up with all the nonsense that has been going on there. Along with individual contributors, many of the managers, C-level execs and VPs have left as well - The CEO is hanging on, The CTO who is useless will mostly stick around until the CEO is there and the remaining exec management are expected to hang in there continuing to drive more people out until they get their golden parachute and retention bonus. The core of the problem in engineering begins at the root. Senior most management and directors are slave drivers who are untrustworthy and some even foulmouthed. People are pushed so hard yet berated at every opportunity after extracting the results. Cronyism is openly fostered and encouraged at every level and people are unfairly compensated, promoted without merit and discriminated at every level. The people who deliver results are never appreciated and the ones who take no accountability or caused trouble or made bad technical decisions are encouraged and promoted instead. The directors, product managers, and the distinguished engineers blindly enforce their own agenda without buy-in from everyone and make the whole place a political and toxic environment. The engineering directors are bad people managers and leaders to begin with. Most of them got promoted very quickly two levels up without merit due to them being buddies with the senior management. They lack basic leadership skills like coaching and do not listen. Instead, their leadership style is command and control. Most of them do not hesitate to complain about people behind their backs and constantly intimidate people into delivering projects with unreasonable deadlines. Some even claim undue credit for revenue generating products for the company even though in their tenure all they have delivered are buggy products to the market that were late and/or struggling to get adopted and ended up burning out their teams. There are insane amount of counter productive release and development processes that are forced down peoples throat and the teams are constantly under high pressure during every release. Except for very few projects where these directors have vested interest in or people they want to protect, almost everyone else gets micromanaged directly or indirectly. Senior management lies to team members that they are empowered to make decisions - but every small decision made is questioned and vetted by ten other people and invariably gets shot down in the end or worse people are blamed or attacked for speaking the truth. The directors themselves never make any decisions and hence they take no responsibility or accountability over anything. The product management organization lacks focus and executes poorly. There is no accountability and no product or quality ownership by the PM. Product managers do not partner effectively with development and instead argue, blame and berate development teams in the name of negotiation. One line requirements are generated on a whim based on incorrect understanding of the market or a quick request from sales channel and dev teams are pressurized to deliver something with unreasonable time-to-market. The focus is purely on quantity over quality - They are incapable of prioritization and do not understand the concept of engineering cost to deliver something. Due to the child like temperament of the PMs and lack of any support from engineering management, dev teams keep their interactions with the PMs to the absolute minimum and churn out sub-par features release after release and end up suffering. Finally, the DE org in Gigamon requires a special mention. The DEs withhold information, are insecure, territorial, have huge egos, look down upon others and behave like a know-it-all. Their daily routine is to come to office late, have water cooler gossips, have two-hour coffee breaks, take long walks, play foosball and go back home. Worse many lack basic communication skills - they are incapable of producing good technical documents or talks; they also avoid participating in technical meetings since they are incapable of holding productive conversations as well. These DEs literally have not produced a single useful thing in the past several years - not a single code library, idea, infrastructure/architectural improvement or any sort of technical content. Most of them mainly survive here due to executive management's protection - stupid ideas like building Gigamon labs or using crowdsourcing for development have been shamelessly promoted as innovative ideas by management without realizing that these folks have become a laughing stock in the organization. The money spent on their salaries and bonuses should have been redistributed to other deserving engineers since these folks have added zero value to the company. Gigamon has so many problems that have gotten bigger over the years and have become unfixable due to its poor technical leaders and senior management. It is a ship that is sailing with no opportunity for growth. Joining Gigamon now or continuing to stay here is not a very sound decision for one's career. Most of the remaining good folks are looking to abandon ship as soon as they can.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 507 Reviews

Glassdoor has 558 Gigamon reviews submitted anonymously by Gigamon employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Gigamon is right for you.