Great leadership, great team and competitive salary - Life Actuary Verisk Employee Review

5.0
23 Dec 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

My line manager shows great leadership, so does the senior management in the BU I'm working with. It's clear what our objectives and strategies are. People here are fantastic to work with. People are results-driven and decisions are made efficiently.

Cons

There could be more initiatives for collaboration between different BUs: e.g., whether solution used in one BU can be adopted to another BU.

avatar
Verisk Response
1y
Hello, thanks for sending us your insights. We appreciate your feedback and are delighted to hear about your positive experience working with us. We are happy to hear that you are pleased with the leadership team. We believe our greatest resource is our people. To best support the evolving needs of our teams, our leaders rely on employee feedback to inform and shape Verisk’s total rewards, benefits, programs, and resources. If there are any suggestions or further feedback you’d like to share, please feel free to reach out.

Explore other reviews about Verisk

5.0
30 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The commitment to flexibility and hybrid work is amazing! The US has a very robust benefits offering. There are several learning and development programs with a diverse range of offerings from self-paced training to more interactive live courses. The people are incredible, you will not find nicer company.

Cons

Verisk is an environment for "do-ers". This is a great place to build your career if you have great work ethic and are motivated to ty new things.

2.0
30 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The people. I worked with genuinely talented, hardworking colleagues who showed up for each other and for the work, even when leadership made that hard.

Cons

Leadership at the senior level was chaotic and unclear, and it trickled down into everything. Projects routinely landed with little to no notice, leaving teams scrambling instead of planning. Budgets were micromanaged from the top while strategic direction was not — a strange mix of tight control over spending and almost no clarity on priorities. Communication from senior leadership rarely made it down to the people actually doing the work, so teams were often the last to know about decisions that directly affected them. There was also a clear undercurrent of fear among some senior leaders that discouraged any real innovation or experimentation — better to play it safe than propose something new. If you're someone who thrives on clarity, planning, and a culture that rewards new ideas, this is not that environment.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All