Great experience in a huge-international company - Anonymous employee Verisk Employee Review

5.0
19 Dec 2024
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- The atmosphere in the Poland office is surprisingly great; similar-sized companies usually have a much more corporate feel. - They genuinely strive to keep you motivated in a positive way. - It's definitely a great place to start your career in the corporate world. - The company appears to be very stable financially. - In some teams and departments, there are opportunities to become a manager quite quickly.

Cons

- Salaries are decent, generally market average, but sometimes slightly below market.

avatar
Verisk Response
1y
Greetings! We were so thrilled to read your review. Thank you for sharing your thoughts about your time at Verisk. We appreciate your feedback and are delighted to hear about your positive experience working with us. At Verisk, we hold a deep belief in the power of bringing your whole self to work — allowing you to flourish in an open, inclusive environment. Your acknowledgment of our culture in the Poland office is truly encouraging. If there are any suggestions or further feedback you’d like to share, please feel free to reach out.

Explore other reviews about Verisk

5.0
1 Jul 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The people are awesome, the culture is strong, and they are terrific career opportunities.

Cons

Getting a little too “doing more with less” happy at the moment

2.0
30 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The people. I worked with genuinely talented, hardworking colleagues who showed up for each other and for the work, even when leadership made that hard.

Cons

Leadership at the senior level was chaotic and unclear, and it trickled down into everything. Projects routinely landed with little to no notice, leaving teams scrambling instead of planning. Budgets were micromanaged from the top while strategic direction was not — a strange mix of tight control over spending and almost no clarity on priorities. Communication from senior leadership rarely made it down to the people actually doing the work, so teams were often the last to know about decisions that directly affected them. There was also a clear undercurrent of fear among some senior leaders that discouraged any real innovation or experimentation — better to play it safe than propose something new. If you're someone who thrives on clarity, planning, and a culture that rewards new ideas, this is not that environment.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All