Much talk, no action... stop the stack rankings - Account Executive Talend Employee Review

1.0
22 May 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Comp plan is decent and many account execs are killing it here and achieving over quota. Good place to be if you have many years of experience in enterprise software. Lots of money to be made in big data.

Cons

Management claims transparency but they operate in a dishonest way. There was an external firm they hired to conduct a survey of how employees felt about Talend's culture. The results were tabulated, and the report was made available to all employees. Seems pretty transparent right? Since then, no action items have been taken to improve the culture at Talend other than the CEO claiming that it brought tears to his eyes during our recent Town Hall. There are rumors floating around that some of the employees who responded negatively to the survey did not receive a good performance review. Was the purpose of the survey really to improve things at Talend or was it to eliminate any and all dissent?

avatar
Talend Response
8y
I’m glad you see an opportunity to make a lot of money here at Talend, and believe we have the market, product, and comp plans to give everyone a great opportunity. But I’m sorry to see that you have a number of misconceptions that are making you unhappy here at Talend. Let me address them here. First, the rumors you cite of lowering the reviews of people who gave feedback to the external consultant we used for our employee survey are completely false. In fact, we specifically designed the survey to be 100% anonymous, so the consultants are the only people in the world who know who gave what feedback. Second, we’re doing exactly what we discussed at the town hall in relation to the feedback: we’re working with the exec team, with the global sales & CSM leadership, and a couple other specific people around the company where we believe we can have the biggest impact this year with increased collaboration and communication to internal teams and customers. So far I’ve seen and heard very positive feedback about the impact these projects have had. Third, our attrition rate is low, better than the industry average, so with occasional exceptions where we lose good people who I’d rather see stay I’m happy with how that’s going. And finally, there’s no stack ranking used in our review process anywhere. The closest thing we have any place in the company is the sales leaderboard in salesforce.com which shows on a real-time basis where reps rank in terms of new ACV achievement and pipeline build. This is common practice with well managed sales teams (and cheered on by the top reps because they see where they stand). Going forward I encourage you to reach out to your direct manager or the leadership team with any further concerns. I promise you your input will not be detrimental but viewed as positive contribution to helping Talend continue to improve. -- Mike Tuchen, CEO

Explore other reviews about Talend

5.0
28 May 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great culture, colleagues, and products

Cons

Acquisition by Qlik caused major disruptions and drove all existing employees away.

1
4.0
29 Sept 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

* Talend has a great foundation for technical growth with a strong product centered on Talend Studio which generates Java code for data integration using visual drag-and-drop components * Strong Eclipse technology and community are built into Talend Studio * Talend Studio addresses both batch integration (Jobs) and application integration (Routes) * Very rich palette of Components for batch integration Jobs * Generated code for event driven Routes uses Apache Camel which is excellent

Cons

* Poor generated code quality * Generated code for batch Jobs lacks a mature underlying framework (e.g. there is no underlying Spring Batch or equivalent that the generated code uses) * Design palette for Routes is very limited and does not contain most Camel components * Components for Camel Routes are poorly documented * Generated code for both Jobs and Routes is monolithic and not easily extended * Limited re-use and modularity of user designs. There is some, but it is not as robust or manageable as it should be. * Does not make use of modern software frameworks such as Spring. * Very poor tools for authoring SQL

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All