Good environment for a big company - Content Enrichment Elsevier Employee Review

4.0
23 Feb 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The environment was welcoming and supportive, and I could tell most people were happy to be there. Perks were relatively nice- good cafeteria, holiday party, decent coffee, etc. People around you have good ideas and are competent at what they do- it would be nice if the structure of the organization was a little more nimble.

Cons

Company was very large, which made coordination and innovation difficult. Publishers are on the brink of big changes, and Elsevier might be too big for its own good. It was hard to communicate across departments; people often felt out of touch with what else was going on, and this affected efficiency, led to redundant work, and reduced employee satisfaction.

Explore other reviews about Elsevier

5.0
11 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Industry leader Great benefits Incentive trips Invests heavily in its employees

Cons

Processes can be burdensome and clunky at times

avatar
Elsevier Response
1mo
Thank you for this balanced and thoughtful review. We're glad to hear that our benefits and investment in people are making a positive impact, those are commitments we take seriously. On the process feedback: Leadership is actively reviewing operational workflows, and the advice to listen more closely to employee feedback is something we're holding ourselves accountable to. If you're open to it, we'd encourage you to bring specific examples forward through your team or people and culture contacts. Change is most effective when it's grounded in the real experiences of the people doing the work, and that means you. Feel free to reach out to us at elseviergdrev@elsevier.com to provide more information Thank you for staying engaged and for caring enough to share this. It matters.
4.0
20 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

-Great company -Team has talented, experienced account managers and product experts who know the territory well

Cons

West team management is heavy on micromanagement and sets unrealistic territory targets without rep input — high turnover, and long tenure in company seems to shield this manager from accountability and growth

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All