Food and Companionship enrinching life - Marketing Associate Elanco Employee Review

5.0
16 Sept 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Elanco crede nelle persone e nelle loro capacità per il successo dell'azienda e dei dipendenti. Sostiene la libera iniziativa e premia i dipendenti. Si lavora tanto e spesso sotto stress, ma la retribuzione, i benefit e le soddisfazioni personali compensano gli sforzi richiesti.

Cons

Elanco è una realtà in continua trasformazione, che genera frustrazione e destabilizza. Non si fa in tempo a trovare un nuovo equilibrio lavorativo, che interviene un nuovo fattore importante di cambiamento.

avatar
Elanco Response
3y
Thanks for the feedback. It’s great to hear that you enjoy working at Elanco. We believe that work-life balance is critical to long-term success for both employees individually as well as our company as a whole. We welcome any suggestions you’re willing to share through your local HR representative.

Explore other reviews about Elanco

5.0
14 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Management listens to their emoloyees. Great benefits.

Cons

Old equipment. Lots of forced ot for hourly employees

2.0
20 Feb 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Plenty of great, passionate coworkers who work hard and collaborate. I had a lot of professional flexibility and my job was always interesting. Process teams on the manufacturing floor is a great system. Offsite resources, especially technical experts, are great.

Cons

Expect to be firefighting constantly and frequently fighting against an aging facility and outdated processes. No unified vision or clear prioritization from management. Misalignment between site leadership and upper/off-site management created sustained operational friction and stress for employees. Leadership turnover was frequent, contributing to ongoing instability. Because of all this, there was a super low morale and a feeling of widespread fatigue. Inconsistent communication and decision-making standards contributed to a low-trust culture, including regular informal discussion of colleagues and unprofessional and sometimes intimidating behavior in meetings. Performance feedback and perceived value were highly dependent on shifting leadership dynamics rather than consistent, objective criteria. Employees could move from being strongly supported to heavily criticized with little change in actual performance. Although a nine-box review process was supposedly used, individual outcomes were not transparently shared with employees. Onboarding and training for specialized roles were underdeveloped. Compensation was just fine for workload and scope of responsibility.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All