Think twice about applying at the Harlem location's UAC program. - Clinician Cayuga Centers Employee Review

1.0
3 Jan 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Working with the UAC population is rewarding in itself. - The pay is great but the benefits are very expensive.

Cons

- Non-therapeutic environment in the form of three tiny rooms with thin walls. The rooms are expected to be shared between 10 clinicians with a total census of 35+ children in the program compromising the quality of the work. - Unpredictable work schedule where you might be required to walk between the two offices, which are 10 blocks apart, multiple times in a day. - Increased work responsibilities irrelevant to the job description with short deadlines on which to complete them. - Blurred lines between being a therapist and a child sitter. - Unprofessional leadership: supervisors will curse and make inappropriate comments, especiall the assistant vp who is often verbally aggressive and vulgar when enraged. - Disorganized class/recreation schedule that makes it difficult to hold scheduled therapy sessions. - It is a federally funded program so continued employment is very unsure. So far they've had to dismiss over 20 employees when the funding was "surprisingly" cut in September.

Explore other reviews about Cayuga Centers

5.0
5 May 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great people here at work

Cons

Pay could be better here

1.0
2 Apr 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great experience with co-workers on site.

Cons

Poor leadership at the executive leadership level who appear overwhelmed and underprepared for their jobs. The "acting" CEO and board members have been invisible and hide from agency staff. Too many "board members" with personal relationships with members of executive leadership and acting CEO. Fiscal mismanagement of federal funds have led to the demise of practically all agency programs across several states. Unfortunately, programs that had nothing to do with the federal dollars have been shut down, leading to extensive layoffs that could have and should have been avoided. The agency has no understanding of budgeting or overall fiscal management which is unbelievable for an agency of this size. And attempting to scapegoat the former CEO as the reason for the demise of this agency is just one example of the poor leadership that has been displayed. Executive leadership does nothing but blatantly lie instead of acting like a leader and sharing hard truths.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All