Recruiter chat, hiring manager, take home assessment that’s supposed to be “time boxed” for 2.5 hours, system design, and idk.
Honestly what Zapier is looking for isn’t actual development chops, they want you to spew out as much AI slop as possible. The take home assessment isn’t actually realistically feasible in 2.5 hours unless you off load a majority of the work to Claude or whatever.
You know, it’s actually fascinating when you think about it. You’re being graded not on actual thought, but just how fast you can pump out code. There’s no rhyme or reason, there’s no thinking about “is this maintainable? Is this going to impact reviews? Is the code going to be understood in 3/6/9 months?”
I mean I guess it’s par for the course at Zapier, they’ve gone all in towards AI “development” because that’s what I guess software development is. But it’ll be interesting to see how they can handle when their stuff inevitably breaks.
I applied through a recruiter. I interviewed at Zapier (Toronto, ON) in Jan 2026
Interview
Initial 1 hour interview with a hiring manager followed by 2.5 hour time limited technical project to build an API for the provided project. The project was backend only and focused on building a reliable usage tracking system.
I found Zapier's interview process to be thorough and well thought out, and they were really communicative with me.
For me, steps were:
1. Recruiter screen
2. Hiring manager interview
3. Take-home (2.5 hour limit)
4. Take home review w/ 2 engineers
5. Systems design
6. "Bar raiser" interview with Director and CPTO
7. References
8. Offers
Two things I found a little odd: there wasn't great clarity on exactly what position I was interviewing for, and also they ask for references before the offer as opposed to making a contingent offer which is a little strange.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
How do you think AI will impact the field of software engineering?