I applied online. I interviewed at Workwize (Netherlands) in Jun 2026
Interview
The process consists of 3 steps: an HR screening, an asynchronous video recording, and a final case study presentation.
The video recording stage is a missed opportunity; a live chat with the hiring manager would be a much more genuine way for candidates to experience the company culture early on. While the case study was advertised as a 6-to-8-hour task, the reality was completely different based on the scope of the requirements.
A major cultural red flag became obvious when looking closely at the company's Glassdoor page: there is a distinct pattern where critical, realistic reviews are suddenly followed by a cluster of generic, 5-star employee reviews posted on the exact same day or within a 24-to-48-hour window.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
I was asked several times about my overall way of working, and one question in particular made me question the company's actual culture:
“How would you validate your design choices if you cannot test with users, and your design peers and engineering resources are completely unavailable?”
I answered by referring to standard product design practices: user research, design critiques, and cross-functional collaboration, which were also mentioned in the job description. Surprisingly, that answer seemed unexpected to them. That led me to wonder whether the company operates in silos or whether this expectation was specific to the team.
Later, when I asked about the company culture, the hiring manager paused before describing it as “flat and collaborative.” That pause said a lot.
This, to me, reflects a fundamental misunderstanding of product design. In a mature product organization, design decisions are validated through research, testing, and collaboration across disciplines. Even in highly complex industries, validation is what creates trust and leads to better outcomes.
If a company removes user testing and cross-functional validation from the process, then the role is no longer really product design; it becomes isolated visual design.
The interview process suggested a culture that prioritizes operational silos over true product maturity, which did not match the collaborative image the company presented externally. Because of that mismatch, I decided to stop the process and withdraw my application.
I applied through other source. The process took 2 weeks. I interviewed at Workwize (Netherlands) (Amsterdam) in Apr 2026
Interview
Interview process started positively: the recruiter reached out for a Growth Lead role and mentioned that my background seemed to match what they were looking for. The recruiter interview went well, but I later learned the position would be contractor-based rather than a standard employment contract, which had not been communicated upfront. Salary expectations were also never discussed during the process.
The hiring manager interview raised additional concerns. The expectations for the role seemed extremely broad and unrealistic for a single position. They were looking for someone with deep expertise across demand generation, outbound email marketing, hands-on execution of paid campaigns (LinkedIn, Meta, etc.), team leadership experience, and strong knowledge of LLMs/AI tools — essentially multiple specialized roles combined into one.
Overall, the process felt disorganized and lacking transparency, especially regarding compensation and employment structure. The company may benefit from defining more realistic expectations for the role and being clearer upfront about contractor status and salary range.
I applied online. I interviewed at Workwize (Netherlands) in Jan 2026
Interview
Worst experience ever. The recruiter showed zero interest, no preparation and no small talk. Never followed up with me. I send an email, nothing. A month later a get an email for another recruiter from the company. Thw standard, no sorry you’re not it. It wasn’t even clear it was from workwize.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
What was harder, being a product designer or owner?