After undergoing a rigorous selection process comprising two personality tests, two case studies involving video presentations, a programming test, an assessment center session, a written programming assessment, and interviews with two senior developers, I was informed of my selection for further consideration. However, the subsequent communication left me concerned. Despite their indication of interest, the company failed to provide crucial details regarding the duration and terms of the initial project-based engagement, and neglected to discuss compensation or present a formal offer. Upon seeking clarification via email, I encountered silence from their end. This lack of transparency and communication raises doubts about their professionalism and commitment to potential employees. Subsequently, I noticed that they had reposted the job offer on LinkedIn, albeit with a significantly condensed recruitment process outlined. Based on my experience, I advise prospective candidates to exercise caution and perhaps reconsider engaging in such an extensive and opaque application procedure, especially when it appears disproportionate to the information provided in the job listing.