employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

eSpark Learning

Is this your company?

eSpark Learning Reviews

3.3

50% would recommend to a friend

(62 total reviews)
avatar

Eric Dahlberg

Not enough data to show CEO approval

47% positive business outlook

eSpark Learning has an employee rating of 3.3 out of 5 stars, based on 62 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The eSpark Learning employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Education industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

62 reviews
1.0
17 Jan 2018

Sinking ship

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The mission of student centricity is an important one.

Cons

In the years I worked at eSpark, the quality of the products steadily declined, as did the company culture. Without anyone with education experience on eSpark’s leadership team, it seemed the team was shooting in the dark at what school districts and teachers “need,” to no avail. Each product iteration flopped worse than the last, leading to diminishing sales and at times, begging teachers and districts to use the products free of charge. With hundreds of negative user reviews, the product team would focus only on one positive teacher review, rather than addressing the fact that the vast majority of users were unhappy and not seeing the results they were promised. Even in the midst of multiple rounds of company layoffs (due to falling drastically short of revenue goals), the leadership team touted that things were better than ever. This level of dishonesty made for toxic culture around the office, with such a major disconnect between the reality and what the leadership team wanted to convey. The reality was that school districts were dropping the products at high rates, and sales were nearly nonexistent. There has been increasingly heavy turnover in the last year as team members from across the company try to jump off of a sinking ship.

avatar
eSpark Learning Response
8y
Thank you for your advice and review. We agree, the mission to be student-focused is an important one. We are committed to listening to feedback and finding solutions that will create a more successful product that is impactful for students.
2.0
24 Mar 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The engineering team is small, so you can potentially have a broad impact on the codebase with less friction than you may experience at a bigger team. When they say full-stack, they mean it here. There is no distinction between backend and frontend engineers; you are expected to be able to ship both aspects. You have the option of working on a variety of platforms, e.g. iOS, Chrome OS, Ruby on Rails, and on different focuses, e.g. the iPad app, MDM. The software development process for all aspects of the tech stack will normally involve peer code review, test coverage, and automated deployment. Equipment provided to you by this company is generally high-quality. That is, laptops you use are top of the line.

Cons

In theory, you can work on any part of the technical stack. In practice, however, you will often be pigeonholed into one area, even if you have more prior experience in a different area of the tech stack. # Project Management and Vision Project management can be much improved. Product managers here tend to be from business rather than education backgrounds, which can lead to decisions that benefit students in superficial ways. There is a tendency among higher-ups to promise more than what our team could deliver, and to demand features that are poorly-specced. Managers outside of the engineering team also tend to view its members as assembly-line workers who exist only to be told exactly what to do without any resistance rather than as technologists with comprehensive computer science backgrounds. That is, if you express concern as to the technical flaws of a particular spec, your experience as an engineer is often dismissed by higher-ups. Progress on long-term projects is often stalled by ambivalence from management. The focus by leadership tends to be on securing sales rather than building a compelling product and service. The eSpark student-facing apps, teacher/school admin dashboard, and MDM services have the potential to be innovative, but consistently fall short of expectations (both from partners and internally). # Compensation I was consistently lowballed when it came to compensation. From talking to people who have the misfortune of continuing to work here, I am hardly alone and far from the worst case in terms of compensation parity. When I started as a software engineer, I was being paid 56K, which I was told by the CTO is the market rate. This, it turns out, is not true. Starting salary for software engineers is 70K. Newer software engineers with far less experience than I had were being paid 30K+ more than I had been, even when accounting for benefits. When I left 3 years later, my rate stayed the same, in spite of having shipped several products that have been integral to the growth of the company. Before my departure, I asked for a raise. The CTO was not willing to budge.

1.0
21 Feb 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- up with technology - great platform "engineer"

Cons

- the product is a scam; ask them if they make their own content or ... - CTO is completely MIA - the "roll model" engineer believes pairing is a total waste of time; also believes "they" right the cleanest code and it's far cry from truth - they chase after employees to right good reviews on social media and in app-store - creativity "seem" to be welcomed but will be taken against you that you don't support the same mission if you disagree with the PMs - product owners do not own their mistake, if the product fails, it's just the engineers fault - the company is building a failed product, they brag about how much the customers love them while they cannot even get the teachers to try the product for free - they are wasting investors money playing with new tech instead of putting the money is research to learn about the market or do anything valuable

Viewing 1 - 3 of 62 Reviews

Glassdoor has 66 eSpark Learning reviews submitted anonymously by eSpark Learning employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if eSpark Learning is right for you.