World Bank Group Reviews

4.1

84% would recommend to a friend

(2,931 total reviews)

Ajay Banga

83% approve of CEO

75% positive business outlook

World Bank Group has an employee rating of 4.1 out of 5 stars, based on 2,931 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an excellent working experience there. The World Bank Group employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Finance industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

3K reviews
2.0
19 Nov 2015

Dreams go to die

Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Superb, brilliant, idealistic people from every corner of the world go there with dreams...

Cons

Management culture has totally fallen apart to the point where management has given up on itself. Everyone within management (and on these reviews) acknowledges it is bureaucratic, inefficient, process rather than thought driven, and worst of all non-meritocratic with promotions based on gender and country of origin and institutional culture riddled with pointless internal politics far worse than at the the big bulge-bracket banks. However, management has no idea how to address these issues. Several former CEOs have written in the FT and other publications that they couldn't handle the middle management bureaucrats out of "Yes, Prime Minister" and so left jaded and returned to Deutche Bank / Goldman / retirement.

1.0
14 Apr 2017

Just like government- lack of ability and inflated ego

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good for people who want to spend a lot of time with family/ retire, provides visas to internationals

Cons

IFC's pay, at senior level, is 1/10th that of private market. Now, you can imagine, what kind of people will be okay with this kind of incentive structure? The people who stay at IFC for a long time, especially those whose only jobs are at IFC, can not transact as real investment professionals. Their ability to negotiate are weak, as they are merely a voice for IFC's internal committees and have not had any experience doing real commercial negotiations in the real world. The most ridiculous is tha IFC still flies a large number of inexperienced but senior staff across the globe to "evaluate projects". These people incur heavy travel costs and visit different continents a few times a year to "share their expertise" and make decisions. How inept would the local professionals (in and out side of IFC) be for them to not know things better than tourists who drop in a few times a year? This is reflected in the IFC's result - as published by its public annual reports, its return is astonishingly low. The longer one stays at IFC, the longer one starts to skew in that mindset and the less they accumulate any transferable skills in the real world, and this is the reason why many lifetime members become lifers.

2.0
18 Aug 2010
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Inspiring mission - Tons of brown bag lunches, lectures, and other dissemination and learning events - Access to cutting edge development research and ideas - Cosmopolitan and international atmosphere - Odds are brilliant academic or renowned development practitioner is sitting in the office next door - Well know (some would say infamous) institution and an asset to any resume - Plenty of opportunities for proactive go-getters

Cons

Most entry and mid -level jobs are offered as either so-called short term (STC) or extended term contracts (ETC). In the case of the former (the most ubiquitous), you are essentially utilized as staff, but are considered a "contractor" for remuneration purposes. STCs receive no benefits, and have to be sure to negotiate a good "daily rate" to avoid being underpaid. ETCs receive some health care and limited paid vacation. Job security is an issue with STCs as the duration of these contracts can vary from just a couple of days to 150 days. In fact, the maximum one can work at the Bank as an STC is 150 days per fiscal year, which means that you either have to take a very long unpaid vacation, take many small unpaid vacations, or find employment for the remaining months. It's also very important to find managers who are willing to mentor you, as it is easy to feel lost in the Bank and training opportunities are limited for STCs. This picture is entirely different for staff positions (or programs such as the JPA or YPO), but these are very competitive and exceedingly difficult to come by. That said, the best way to get these positions is by starting off as an STC, working hard, and becoming skilled in the art of "Bank politics." One more thing to consider is that Americans have to pay normal taxes over their earning, whereas foreign nationals don't have pay income tax at all. As a result Americans are discriminated against, either in terms of net pay, or if the gross pay is adjusted accordingly, in terms of opportunities since managers will be hesitant to hire "more expensive" Americans.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 2,931 Reviews

Glassdoor has 5,042 World Bank Group reviews submitted anonymously by World Bank Group employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if World Bank Group is right for you.