Testing Mavens Reviews

3.3

58% would recommend to a friend

(60 total reviews)

Feby George and Jayan Joseph

60% approve of CEO

56% positive business outlook

Testing Mavens has an employee rating of 3.3 out of 5 stars, based on 60 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Testing Mavens employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Information Technology industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

60 reviews
5.0
8 Oct 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The company has a Competent work culture

Cons

There are no cons in this company

1.0
18 Mar 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good learning opportunities and exposure to real-time projects. Team members were supportive and helpful. Gained valuable practical experience.

Cons

Work environment felt toxic at times due to administrative issues. There was unnecessary involvement in employees’ personal matters, which created discomfort. Instances of unprofessional behavior, including mocking in common areas like the pantry, added to the stress. Lack of proper communication and coordination from the admin side further impacted the work environment.

2.0
10 Mar 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

• Work from home / remote options are sometimes available depending on the project. Fun fact: if you are based outside Kerala, you might get it, but if you are in Kerala, it’s almost always “sorry, office only” no clear reason why. (Yes, really!)
 •In some teams you are mostly left alone to complete your work without constant interference.
 • The company can offer a decent salary hike when joining compared to a previous job.

Cons

• Very limited clients and projects. If you end up on the bench there are very few internal opportunities. • Career growth is quite limited. There are no clearly defined promotion paths or roles, the hierarchy is confusing, and employees may remain in the same position for long periods without meaningful progression. • Appraisal policies are not employee-friendly. There is no appraisal in the first year, and depending on the timing of your joining, you may have to wait several months or longer before receiving any raise.
 • Favouritism and internal politics can sometimes be noticed, which affects fairness in opportunities and recognition.
 • Company policies can change at any time without prior communication, and employees are generally expected to simply accept these changes.
 • The organisation appears to be in an awkward transition phase. Earlier when it operated more like a startup, employees reportedly had better connection with leadership and better hikes. Now the company tries to present itself as an established organisation, but it has lost many of the advantages of a startup while still lacking the structured culture and systems of a mature company.
 • Office administration and HR sometimes focus heavily on unnecessary micromanagement. For example, strict seating arrangements are enforced in the office even though the workspace is relatively small and everyone can already see each other easily. If an employee temporarily sits in another empty seat, the HR/admin team may send escalation emails asking the employee to return to their assigned seat immediately. In fact, even in this small office where everyone can clearly see each other, sitting in the wrong chair for a few minutes can trigger an escalation email, a level of monitoring that feels excessive and does not meaningfully improve productivity or collaboration.
 • Raising concerns about such policies or providing feedback about HR/admin practices does not always lead to constructive discussions. In some situations, employees feel that feedback is taken personally rather than professionally, which discourages people from raising genuine concerns. • Work–life balance can be inconsistent. While there may be a few projects where employees experience reasonable balance, these seem to be exceptions rather than the norm. Since the company has a limited number of clients and projects, employees often have little choice in project allocation, and in many cases the workload can make it difficult to maintain a healthy work–life balance. Overall, it largely depends on luck and the specific project you are assigned to.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 60 Reviews

Glassdoor has 63 Testing Mavens reviews submitted anonymously by Testing Mavens employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Testing Mavens is right for you.