Pros
I cannot think of a single pro for this operation.
Cons
Everything from the arrogant and abusive CEO to the complacent Co-Founder and embrace of blatant unethical practices from hiring to daily operations. If you have a professional reputation to preserve please do not apply, there’s so many other organizations that won’t dismiss equity in pay, intentionally misinform borrowers (no clue how CFPB left them open), harass and bully (CEO is a pro at public humiliation and degradation) staff, ride the line of legalities and utterly bastardize the ideology of “team work.” SB’s definition of “team work” means executing only the ideas the CEO has conjured up in his derogatory mind and you can count on those ideas being elementary at best but narcissistically held up. The Co-founder is equally as bad in that there’s clear evidence he knows CEO decisions are based on ego stroking and settling scores with staff members who only try to save his notoriously horribly run company.
