Root Capital Reviews

4.0

87% would recommend to a friend

(42 total reviews)

Willy Foote

84% approve of CEO

64% positive business outlook

Root Capital has an employee rating of 4.0 out of 5 stars, based on 42 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Root Capital employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Finance industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

42 reviews
4.0
15 Jan 2016

Come for the mission, stay for the people

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

There is a high level of individual drive and motivation which makes the work very rewarding. "Mission-driven" is a term you will hear often, from the CEO to the Board to new staff. The message is backed up through the organization's actions on the ground, and there is deep pride in the work being accomplished. Collaboration is key to everyone's job. Most assignments entail working across teams and leadership levels, and often with staff in regional offices in Africa or Latin America. You have to be able to get outside your silo and be eager to work with different personalities, cultures, and stakeholders. Most people have such a niche role that there isn't the sense that you have to compete for promotions, projects, or accolades. For the most part, staff have autonomy in their work (not too many micromanagers). Annual goals are set after a yearly performance review early in the year. Managers are asked to have quarterly meetings to check on the progress of your annual objectives, and for you to give upwards feedback to them. Work pressure varies depending on whether your stakeholders are internal or external. Those who are mostly externally facing (working with clients, donors, investors, the industry) have higher stakes. The organization also features strong leaders who believe in the mission to their core, who motivate others with their conviction, and who mentor others through skill and knowledge sharing. There is growing interest in strengthening management skills and encouraging leadership opportunities across the organization, though there wasn't yet a comprehensive strategy or common practice around this. As the organization grows, staff roles are becoming more specialized and aligned with the financial services and banking professions. Root attracts incredibly bright, interesting, globally-minded people. Some of the best minds and hearts you'll ever come across. The ambiance is very collegial, open, and casual, but fueled by big ideas and an intensity to over-deliver given what is at stake. What keeps staff going in Cambridge is the unique team culture, high spirits, and a sense of commitment to your team and staff.

Cons

Newcomers tend to be drawn by the mission of alleviating rural poverty through agricultural development, and may compromise on salary or job grade to enter the sector. Since Cambridge is the global HQ (there are a dozen regional offices scattered around the globe), you are physically far removed from the work on the ground. Some roles involve travel to the field, but being a nonprofit, Root is conscientious about its budget and whether staff travel is necessary for the business at hand. Root is also susceptible to the chronic nonprofit issue of often being understaffed. Many are quickly given more responsibility and work than anticipated. This allows you to learn and grow beyond your expectations. Most staff feel valued, if overworked. This can also lead to longer work days and burn-out unless you learn to reign it in and you have your manager's support in balancing your workload. A career path is hard to carve since it is a small to mid size staff (~60 in Cambridge), but there is regular turnover. There is no formal mentoring program, but if you have the self-initiative to seek someone out for advice, they will be happy to give you guidance. It can be difficult to know how to distinguish yourself among a collection of highly motivated and intellectually nimble people, unless your manager advocates for leadership and growth opportunities for you. Since its core business is financial services and agriculture, the organization's financial health can be sensitive to exogenous events in the commodities market or crop production -- despite hard work and achievements within the organization.

3.0
31 Jul 2015

Manager

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Mission driven Brilliant and highly educated employees Young and vibrant environment Charismatic CEO

Cons

Group think at the top mgmt ranks Poor communication to external offices in field Top down decision making/a bit paternalistic Weak HR dept.with poor systems

3.0
3 Apr 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

100% work-from-home flexibility. My immediate team was a dream—supportive, collaborative, and genuinely kind. Great work-life balance. Better benefits than most local companies in Costa Rica, including extra vacation days, generous sick leave, and the full last week of the year off. No-meeting Fridays helped protect deep work time. Opportunities to work on meaningful projects in the agricultural development space. International exposure and cross-functional collaboration

Cons

Very clique-driven culture. If you’re not part of the long-time “OG Rooters” or don’t come from an NGO/agribusiness background, it can be hard to feel like you truly belong. Poor internal communication and inconsistent messaging across teams. Executive decision-making lacks structure. Priorities shift often, sometimes without a clear explanation. Many managerial roles oversee just one or two direct reports, leading to unnecessary layers and limited growth opportunities. Despite its small size, the organization feels disorganized, with blurred roles and frequent last-minute changes. A culture of “everyone can voice their opinions” often lacked clear boundaries, leading to a sense of entitlement and excessive individual requests that delayed decision-making. Significant language barriers across departments. Some staff responsible for managing providers or systems primarily in English cannot communicate effectively without interpreters, adding unnecessary cost and inefficiency to operations. Hiring monolingual staff in key roles is taking a toll on collaboration and effectiveness. Long-tenured employees are often resistant to change and trapped in outdated, traditional ways of working, which stifles innovation.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 42 Reviews

Glassdoor has 49 Root Capital reviews submitted anonymously by Root Capital employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Root Capital is right for you.