employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Plains Midstream

Is this your company?

Plains Midstream reviews about "upper management"

40% positive business outlook

Reviews by job title

8 reviews
1.0
23 Nov 2019

Terribly managed

Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good co workers, other companies in area are still willing to hire plains employees, lots of overtime

Cons

All the managers there never operated in this facility so they just don't understand what it is to operate there. All they focus on is loading operators up with menial tasks like painting on night shifts, checking car seals, checking fire extinguishers and other idiotic things. there is only 1 or 2 competent operator on each shift and simple plant checks get missed constantly. Things constantly break because maintenance doesn't fix anything at all. They also hired contract 'operators' they are actually informants and rat out the fulltime employees to upper management. If u want to put your safety at risk then work there with a bunch of burnt out employees who hate their lives. There is no experience working there and zero mentorship. They replace process experience with incompetent contract rail loaders. The supervisor thinks as long as you do your training modules your are now competent and good to go. One 20 something year old kid with 3 months operating experience was given a high risk project with zero support at all. There is also no communication between workers here and I have a feeling there will be a disaster there which is why I got out as soon as I could get hired somewhere else. Everyone else is looking to do the same and it's easy to see why after the glam wears off

2.0
23 Sept 2020

Very reactive

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Benefits definite above average for industry.

Cons

Upper Management is lacking integrity

1.0
27 Oct 2021

Trying locally, bit cancer still remains

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good pay and benefits, new plant management want to make things better without interference from upper management.

Cons

Lack of knowledge in the front office, people promoted because how bad they’d be willing to treat people. Hourly employees have been at work through COVID, yet we could be punished for nor completing our “ Return to work Training” on time. Training consists of an online document with an acknowledgment. “Training Specialist” role is just to keep LTIP intact, more like a training secretary. We need training that creates people that can think and react. Now that DL is leaving, there is only 2 more senior managers that need to be purged. He was one of the 5 that caused the engagement numbers on site to be so low. Locally, they demoted one of the causes back to the planning department, but he’s still here. Just let us do our jobs.

2.0
11 Mar 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Field staff are proficient, pay is competitive, compensation adequate.

Cons

Maintenance and systems not functional for needs of the business. Management unable to have input from experience and alternative facts being told about current Maximo’s system functionality. Too much staff on the top end. Need more capable upper management with oil industry experience.

1.0
14 Jul 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Bonus paid quarterly that is all.

Cons

Horrible culture, favoritism based on who you know and suck up to. Some management trying to change culture but when so engrained in the upper management hopeless unless you boot all VP's who have been around more then 5 years. Management decides on your career path not the employee. Well known to come up to employees and say you will be in this position tomorrow, even tho it may be a position not suited to the employees abilities.

1.0
7 Dec 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Competitive salary, benefits and long term incentive program.

Cons

This Workplace is toxic! Office employees are expected to work OT, but are not paid to do so. If you are one of the employees who works your scheduled 8 hours and goes home on time all of the other employees on your team learn to resent you. Plains resorts to fear tactics and empty promises to get their employees to stay longer and take on extra duties. Even if you stay late, perform extra duties and try to prove yourself and an asset to the company, nothing will come of it. Plains will take advantage of you as long as they can with promises of promotions that never come. Performance is not what gets you a promotion at Plains. No one is an asset to Plains, everyone is expendable and the only guarantee of moving up is given to employees who are connected/related to upper management.

1.0
10 May 2020

Operations is a mess

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Compensation is slightly below average, but never-the-less still in the realm of average - Truly great benefits - Convenient field office staff schedule (earn every other Friday off) - Opportunities for career growth both vertical and lateral - but only if you're "IN" - Generally, friendly staff level employees - Nice office building HQ in Calgary located in the heart of Downtown - Job security

Cons

There are essentially two sides of the Plains Midstream Canada (PMC) structure - Commercial and Operations (which includes Engineering). Feedback from those working on the Commercial side is generally positive. PMC grew very quickly via a Marketing first business model which successfully launched them into the relatively impressive size they are today. Regardless of their official stance, following their rapid growth PMC has managed to stay true to their core strengths of a Marketing first business model. The Commercial half runs the company (which makes sense). However, this has come at a cost. While this strategy may have worked well for a startup/small company, PMC has grown and acquired numerous assets such that they can no longer be considered nor operated like a small company. PMC continues to place importance of "strategic" marketing decisions above all else including operational feasibility and safety. While this business model proved well when the only assets of significance PMC owned and operated were small storage sites, it cannot be safely implemented when operating larger facilities. Reactions to sudden changes in the market require sudden changes to a facility's process, resulting in significant process upsets and therefore cause an unsafe and unnecessary toll on equipment. This is just an example of the kinds of issues the Operations half of company has to deal with on a weekly (often daily) basis. The Commercial half is too used to the flexibility they safely had access to as a small company with few and simple assets but currently, simply do not have the background to understand the impacts to operational process and safety these commercially strategic moves introduce. Individuals in operational leadership (i.e. Operations upper management) also fall in to this category of naivety. Blame for the resulting negative impacts tends to consistently fall on Operations who are left to clean up the mess. Rinse and repeat until the next opportunity arrives the following week. Again, the Commercial half runs the company. It is of no surprise that the Operations half has a budget for less than a skeleton crew. It has been like this since pre-2014 so this fact and the oil crash appear to be independent. As a result Operations side employees are very clearly dissatisfied with the immense individual responsibility expected by each employee with no path forward from upper management on how to mitigate this ongoing issue. The Engineering department is shockingly slim. Operations and Engineering staff turnover is very high with what appears to have been a mass (voluntary) exodus over the past few years. It is of no coincidence that the Fort Saskatchewan facility lost over 90+% of their Operations Technicians staff over this time due to resignations. It is of no coincidence that the Sarnia facility has had an Operations Shift Lead job posting unfilled for over a year - a position that would typically be filled instantly at most other facilities. The transition of a company from small to medium sized will result in growing pains. There are two types of companies that result from this transition. One: from this era, a company experiencing the growth will make mistakes, learn from them as an organization, re-tool their core competencies and adapt to their new niche in the market. Two: those who count on their past success and hope it works out the same in a new and inexperienced environment. Plains Midstream Canada appears to fall into the category of the latter as it has been far too long since their transition from small to medium began over a decade ago with few signs of striving to become like the former. Those who were around at the beginning of the transition appear to have recognized the direction the company was heading and have nearly all since moved on to be a part of PMC's competitors such as Pembina or Secure Energy.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 8 Reviews

Glassdoor has 200 Plains Midstream reviews submitted anonymously by Plains Midstream employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Plains Midstream is right for you.