PayRange Reviews

3.5

55% would recommend to a friend

(16 total reviews)

Paresh Patel

67% approve of CEO

65% positive business outlook

PayRange has an employee rating of 3.5 out of 5 stars, based on 16 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The PayRange employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Finance industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

16 reviews
1.0
2 Apr 2016

One big joke

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Some of the employees are very good and smart people. There is no innovation in the vending industry so this is the only new thing that's come out in a while. We get some free lunches now and there is ample space in the offices. Very quite work environment and everyone gets to leave the office at around 4.

Cons

Where do I start. It is the most dysfunctional company ever. The CEO has no idea how to run his company and he's managed out anyone who doesn't do exactly as he says or they resign because he makes it known that it's his way or no way. I've watched him throw everyone under the bus for his failures ( his own admin, his family, other execs, customers, contractors, you name it!) he claims to everyone that the company is doing good when it's not. There are annoucements about non-existing "wins". We have a lot of complaining customers but any word about how to fix the problems are forbidden. It's like he does not live in a world of reality. I've seen so many people come and go. There are only like 4 people who've lasted over a year. We've had weeks where someone quits everyday. It's never announced but it's a small company and we all know. He's also laid off whole offices and groups for no reason. Most of the company has complained to HR but even that lady only lasted a few months before she left too. The CFO and the COO also left after only a few months. The company is not doing well yet he won't let anyone make decisions that wasn't his idea. Every month he has meetings to talk about himself or some other useless thing, he never talks about revenue or growth and when asked, he tells the whole company we make money yet at other times he says we are not. Our scrum meetings are him just talking and making decisions. The product person just plays by his rules, Nothing, I mean nothing happens in the company without him making the decision. Yes, he decides what's for lunch, what color an icon should be, what snacks we should have. It's so restrictive and employees are not allowed to express opinion. All hands meetings are just him talking while others roll thier eyes. He calls himself " Dr." and starts his conversations with " I have a ph.d" despite it being from some online university that anyone can get in a few weeks. He publishes articles about himself and how he runs the company that are completely made up. You will never meet another person that's as conceited. Check out our website and every piece of our marketing material, it's just extensive pictures of him ( done by him and not our marketing person, because she left after a few months too!) Search his name and endless articles about how he was fired from his last start up will appear. The whole community knows he was fired because no one can work with him. It's very reflective of the situation here. The product is promising but has a lot of problems. Customers and vendors complain yet they are ignored. The feedback is public, you can't pretend it's not there. As much is swept under the rug as possible. Our presence at trade shows are awkward. People come up to us for freebies and no one cares about the product. We need to do better planning especially for the big this month. And we need to not sell things that don't exist. People lost a lot of faith in us because we started selling things that we have not developed a year in advanced, and never delivered, Our suffering sales people need a full time professional leader, yet they get a part time contractor.

1.0
19 Apr 2016

Run! Do not walk. Run!

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I met a few great people that I'd like to work with again. Otherwise I have nothing positive to say.

Cons

This was the worst employment situation of my career. The only good part was after I got laid off I landed a dream job a few weeks later where I feel respected and valued. Everything the other reviewers have said is true. The CEO is utterly incompetent and has the worst people skills of any business leader I've ever met. He is only truly comfortable when he's in front of a group of people speaking into a microphone while everyone else listens. At one company meeting he spoke non-stop for 4 hours, then spoke at the company dinner afterward for an hour, then manned the mic at the company picnic the following day for almost 3 hours. Completely surreal. Any other situation is a train wreck. The CEO routinely exaggerates and outright misrepresents company's performance to employees, recruits, and customers. He is a PT Barnum with a business card, who leaves a swath of pissed off former employees and customers wherever he goes. Anyone looking at this company for employment should ask tough questions about the business model. Advertising revenue is a pipe dream and the core business is a loser. It's unclear how this company will ever make money, to say nothing of profitability. Beware, unless you like jobs where you are on-call 24/7, routinely get patronized, and the company regularly breaks its commitments to customers and employees and expects you to handle the wreckage.

1.0
19 Jun 2016

Would be funny to watch if it weren't tragic

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Had some great co-workers there. Unfortunately, the best people either leave, or are let go, or some of them are trapped in a bad job for various reasons.

Cons

This part could go on forever. I'll try to keep it as short as possible. The CEO thinks he has business management figured out already, whereas reality begs to differ. And yet he turns a deaf ear to any advice. He tends to be very controlling, he micromanages the whole company. He appears to be viscerally opposed to the idea of delegating anything of consequence. The top people in the company, reporting directly to the CEO, fall into either one of two categories: 1. Those who are smart and capable. They either disgustedly leave on their own, or are let go - either way they don't last more than a few months. 2. Those who keep their jobs forever because they just approve and repeat blindly all "wisdom" dispensed from above. A whole department was created in Palo Alto, complete with their own office and top leadership. A few months later everyone was let go. All the wasted money - for what? Was the CEO uncomfortable with the fact that the person in charge in Palo Alto was pretty smart and could think on their own? The Engineering office in San Jose keeps suffering for lack of true and competent leadership. There was almost a revolt there at some point, due to dissatisfaction with their leadership, but nothing ever changed. The main office in Portland is under direct supervision by the CEO. Everyone tries to convince themselves to keep on keeping on, repeating mantras such as "we have a great team" or "we have a great product". This could have been a runaway success story. The company is in an industry many years behind current technology, and the core business idea is good. This is the archetypal low-hanging fruit, if there ever was one. Too bad the leadership is working so hard to snatch defeat from the jaws of easy victory.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 16 Reviews

Glassdoor has 19 PayRange reviews submitted anonymously by PayRange employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if PayRange is right for you.