PandaDoc Reviews

3.5

62% would recommend to a friend

(426 total reviews)
avatar

Mikita Mikado

67% approve of CEO

55% positive business outlook

PandaDoc has an employee rating of 3.5 out of 5 stars, based on 426 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The PandaDoc employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Information Technology industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

426 reviews
1.0
1 Jul 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Some people are really nice

Cons

Not a serious place for Product Managers with 5+ years of experience. They've lucked out with product-market fit a decade ago and have been living off of that ever since. There's no direction and the inner circle at leadership lives in an echo chamber, allergic to being challenged by new ideas.

4.0
29 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

1. Strong internal tools and tech stack with great integrations 2. Supportive team culture to grow and improve 3. Real investment into CSM strategy and growth from leadership 4. Complex accounts for strategy and relationship building 5. Managerial support during onboarding and beyond

Cons

1. Tool sprawl is consisten across CSMs - many duplicative tools with less guidance or guardrails. 2. Book of Business can be a bit disorganized from previous CSMs - building a plan to attack the book is key, has to be customized. 3. Some documentation gaps between handoffs on accounts - tool stack lends to information being saved in various locations which is a bit tedious to wade though.

1.0
10 Jun 2026

Avoid if you value integrity and skilled leadership

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

decently nice coworkers. Internet paid for?

Cons

Where to begin? Pandadoc is directionless. The company creates revenue because the product is fairly simple and low-cost. And yet, there’s no product roadmap in sight to expand revenue into new markets or geos. Most directors and above are acting within the “peter principle” and shift blame and accountability to lowly ICs. I’ve never seen anything like it in my career. Said “leadership” can’t create a sticky strategy if their jobs depended on it—oh wait! That’s why they scapegoat ICs! Easier to blame an IC2 than take responsibility for their poor choices or no choices for that matter. There’s no top-down planning anywhere at this company. And because there’s no planning, everyone at the bottom has to compensate for the lack of direction and prioritization. That has led to burnout, attrition and the lowest morale I’ve seen at a tech company since 2020. The company has zero career laddering, departments go years without promoting a single team member, but the CEOs inner circle get promotions every year. I’ve never seen a strategy from marketing or sales. Ask an AE how many times Pd has tried to pivot markets or segments!

Viewing 1 - 3 of 426 Reviews

Glassdoor has 452 PandaDoc reviews submitted anonymously by PandaDoc employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if PandaDoc is right for you.