Material Reviews

3.5

64% would recommend to a friend

(734 total reviews)
avatar

Laila Worrell

69% approve of CEO

51% positive business outlook

Material has an employee rating of 3.5 out of 5 stars, based on 734 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Material employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Management and consulting industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

734 reviews
1.0
22 Oct 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- diverse group of smart and strong individuals, from associate level all the way up to senior VPs. Many different skillsets, perspectives, and backgrounds.

Cons

There is embarrassingly incompetent senior management. The CEO change has turned a once productive work environment into a toxic environment. There were issues several years ago, but a strong work culture was established the last 2-3 years - but that has been deleted in the past year with the new senior management. The CEO takes no responsibility for bad decision that cost the company and led to multiple rounds of layoffs and a seemingly never-ending freeze on promotions, bonuses, and raises. Senior management also made poor decisions on the structure of business units, which has led to a visible drop in morale and growth opportunities. These things have made negative impacts on work/life balance and had a huge negative effect on the effectiveness, efficiency, and communication on business units. The CEO has zero self awareness, is a terrible communicator, and has continuously demonstrated that he does not have a game plan to take the company out the hole. To top it all off, the tactlessness of senior management destroys company morale - it was on full display when they told people to "focus on personal growth instead of our salaries" when telling the whole company that there will be an indefinite freeze on all promotions, bonuses, and raises.

1.0
10 Oct 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

You'll get trained as a junior level employee and get to work with some of the coolest clients. The mid and junior-level employees are awesome people who are willing to help each other

Cons

Unfortunately, the leadership at this company has completely destroyed any trust, morale and work-life balance that used to exist here. Junior-level employees are expected to work significant amounts of overtime hours to complete boring tasks through inefficient systems. The company is openly staffing people to a 45-hour work week, meaning you usually work 45-50 hours a week. Those working 45 hours or less are told they're underperforming and need to work more to help balance the workload. Promotions and pay raises have been frozen all year and the company has experienced multiple rounds of layoffs. Amid promotion freezes, the company hired offshore teams to outsource resources to, instead of investing in their own existing employees and systems. The company bids extremely complex and over-priced projects to needy clients who demand their results on fast timelines. This places a lot of pressure on junior employees to execute the work quickly, even though these complex projects need more time. This results in overworked people who are burnt out. Pay is competitively low and the company is hesitant to promote, even when not in a promotion freeze.

2.0
18 May 2024

Atrocious work culture--stay away

Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- The people are incredibly smart, and you will learn a lot. - The difficulty of the job makes you extremely prepared for other roles in market research.

Cons

- Nonsensical time tracking: This company made me swear off any jobs that required me to track project hours. If we did not have enough work, we were basically encouraged to lie about our project hours to keep utilization high. At the same time, employees were reprimanded for skewed margins since a high amount of time was being charged to projects. Make it make sense. - Unhealthy hyper-fixation on utilization: While we're on the topic, let's deep dive into utilization a bit more. Management truly misused this metric, with absolutely zero benefit to employees. In my opinion, utilization should have been used to 1) understand how we should pursue new business opportunities 2) balance projects through each business unit properly. Ultimately, utilization was used to tell employees they were not doing enough, resulting in unrealistic expectations around project hours. Basically, schedules were stacked with 8+ hours of work (which always resulted in overtime, considering the fact that if anything additional came up, you'd have to stay late). The way the company calculated utilization didn't even make sense. Mandatory holidays and PTO (including sick days) lowered your utilization, resulting in the need to "make up" for those hours in order to keep your utilization high. I reiterate--make it make sense. - Terrible work-life balance: Piggybacking off my last point, the work-life balance was truly terrible. Working 10-12 hour days was a regular occurrence. Be prepared to receive messages over the weekend and emails late at night or super early in the morning. I've been in meetings where people openly joked about working 60+ hour weeks for months. Smells like Stockholm Syndrome. - Pay does not match expectations: If salaries were extremely competitive, my previous points would have been *somewhat* more excusable. However, salaries were average at best, bordering abysmal due to a long pay freeze (unsure the status of this since I no longer work there). And of course, no overtime pay despite always having to work overtime. Cool! - Obnoxious leadership: Oh brother, where do I begin? Senior leadership, I am speaking to you directly: Stop trying to be quirky and relatable during important company meetings. I don't want to hear about your kids making fart jokes during an All Hands. I want to know whether I'll be able to afford rent next year. Hope this helps! All jokes aside, this job severely impacted my mental health. After accepting a new role, I found it difficult to forget the high-stress mindset that I learned here, and I was pretty on edge despite my new employer being considerably more chill. It took awhile for me to not have anxiety closing my laptop at 5pm sharp. Needless to say, quitting was one of the best things I did for myself.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 734 Reviews

Glassdoor has 793 Material reviews submitted anonymously by Material employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Material is right for you.