Magnopus Reviews

4.1

81% would recommend to a friend

(59 total reviews)

Ben Grossmann

90% approve of CEO

74% positive business outlook

Magnopus has an employee rating of 4.1 out of 5 stars, based on 59 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an excellent working experience there. The Magnopus employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Arts, entertainment and recreation industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

59 reviews
1.0
24 Jul 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Not a lot of OT, and good work/life balance - Some of the nicest people work there - Good diversity (for a tech studio) - Can be a good foot in the door to the industry, or decent if you just need a paycheck.

Cons

- Bad "start-up" mentality that everyone on the team helps out where needed. Only apply if you're a generalist or if you like wearing a lot of hats, because that is an expectation at the company. This expectation has also lead to the elimination for 'specialist roles' in the studio. Don't apply if you want to be somewhere to hone your craft. - Pay can be inconsistent across art department members (even with same job title). It can be above average, or well below average, but it depends on which recruiter you talk to or if you are willing to fight for your worth. This leads the studio to take advantage of more soft-spoken or non-confrontational applicants, and leads to pay disparity among teammates. - High turnaround for artists :( - CEO likes to talk about 1-star Glassdoor reviews in company chat

2.0
25 Jul 2021

I wish Magnopus the best (and to be better)!

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

-Very strong Art and Engineering team when I was there. -Majority of people are very friendly and great to work with. -Some nice benefits.

Cons

-Company leadership isn't very good, and they totally wasted a very talented team of artists. Magnopus suffers from mismanagement of projects, and does not understand what an art pipeline is. If you are an artist you are expect to do more technical or generalist work rather than what you were hired for. There are/were some great people to work with there, but sadly looks like most if not all have moved on. -A former employee would often take credit from employees below them, and actively sabotaged work on projects. Another employee would brag about not doing certain parts of job and expecting others to clean up after them. -There are no internal deadlines and everyone in the front of the pipeline eats up all the time which leaves the later half to scramble and work unpaid overtime to get projects done. -I was lied to during the interviewing process. I worked there for over 2 years and never got a performance review, or a raise. The CEO also said that they pay everyone within a 1% difference of the same job title. I was paid nearly 25% less than people in my same position. -When I put in my 2 week notice. It was the first time a higher manager had talked to me in over a year. They than proceeded to tell me how they were worried and afraid that these other employees would leave. Seemingly not even caring that I myself was leaving. -Nepotism isn't unheard of here. People were often chosen for higher positions even though they didn't know what they were doing. -Higher ups try to say they give people the proper attention and focus to cater to their skills, but they don't do that at all. I.E. Studio management didn't really talk to me for over a year which I heard among other employees that was the same case for them, too. If you're hired as an artist you'll more than likely be doing “Tech Art” or “Generalist” work. -All in all I think the thing that makes me the most sad is how some of the employees were treated. Some were the nicest, easiest to get along with, hard working, and talented people I got to work with. Unfortunately they were brought down, dismissed, or left the company due to leadership not listening or mistreating them.

3.0
5 Jul 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Great benefits - Inspiring projects - Difficult problems to solve at a software, hardware, and human level - Leadership circle who cares* (see cons) - Upward mobility for those who ask for it* (see cons) - Big amount of impact on the final product - Great resume builder - Talented coworkers - New(er) production staff is amazing and really cares about the team. - Everyone has something to teach and readily gives this knowledge

Cons

- Leadership cares, but needs to acknowledge the inner circle that has formed as the company has grown. There are high ups in design and engineering who act unprofessionally to people below them. These people need to understand what is and is not okay when they reach that level at a company. Do they have any oversight? Have they had any leadership training or did they just move up because they served the company well? Tenure is not good enough. Give them the tools to be more equitable leaders who can see past their own opinions and egos. Hold them accountable. - The CEO should not try to direct projects while also running the company. It adds far too much noise, detracts from the heavy lifting done by the rest of them, and is not as helpful as them being a great CEO (which they are). - Tons of micromanagement and thrashing from production and leads, who scramble to find solutions but often can hardly decide things amongst themselves. - The company is still figuring out what mobility looks like at its larger scale. Softer personalities seem to rarely win a the loudest person in the room is sometimes the only one that's heard. - All in all, I would recommend the company but with various caveats. If Magnopus addresses its growing pains, leadership and cultural improvements, it can be a great place to work.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 59 Reviews

Glassdoor has 67 Magnopus reviews submitted anonymously by Magnopus employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Magnopus is right for you.