employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Gundersen Health System

Engaged employer

Gundersen Health System Reviews

3.9

76% would recommend to a friend

(360 total reviews)

Scott Rathgaber

76% approve of CEO

63% positive business outlook

Gundersen Health System has an employee rating of 3.9 out of 5 stars, based on 360 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Gundersen Health System employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Healthcare industry (3.4 stars).

Reviews by job title

360 reviews
3.0
10 Jul 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Lower than average nurse to patient ratios throughout the hospital. Reasonable attempts to keep up to date with technology. Good equipment. Most nurses are competent and strive to provide great care. The nursing staff are what keep it worth sticking around. The unit level managers really do care about their staff and try to do what they can to improve retention. Non-salary benefits are adequate.

Cons

You really are a number when you're an RN at Gundersen. Members of clinical management once informed us there are three nursing schools nearby and you can easily be replaced if you don't like the way things are. There are no incentives to perform beyond mediocrity aside from being shouldering additional committee/project work. The pay is not competitive (~$5+ an hour deficit) with other organizations that draw nurses from the region like Mayo, UW Health and the Twin Cities organizations. Experience isn't consistently a benefit when you come from another organization in terms of pay. Everyone gets the same raises across the board year after year creating a wage stagnation issue for staff (but a boon for the organization). Problem employees are moved around departments until people stop bringing concerns to management.

3.0
18 Feb 2012
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Patient Care paramount to system. Ethics are strong. Believe in their Mission and Values. Specialists are very knowledgable and very accessible. Excellent Clinical Guideline sources from specialities. Multiple Awards for Excellence in Medicine given to System. Low turnover, but that was changing. Adequate CME allowance, but not if used for High travel or hotel cost CME events. Business Expenses covered, probably usual amount. I did not use very often. Job offer comes quickly if offered.

Cons

Communication poor, although listed as very important. Tons of email once employed, but few of real value to a physician, ie. a lot of IT advisements, or general staff advisements. Understaffed, but may be OK in Main Center. Trending to a lot of MA's vs nurses, with very limited abilities related to their lack of education in nursing knowledge. They make poor nurse replacements and therefore poor helpmeets for physicians. Some can be outstanding, but you know they are not going to stay an MA for long. Vacation and CME time per usual, but very limited ability to take that time, with increasing restrictions on when one can use it, and then if not used, it disappears. Heavy emphasis on Leadership ability and being a Leader, but no time allowances for it. It all must be done on own time. Education offered but again own time used. No travel time allowances leading to need to be in 2 places at the same time. Confusing documentation system for work meetings, CME, vacation, sick time, etc. Everything on computer, eg. Doctor Handbook, and the other usual basics usually given in hard copy by other clinic systems, and updated yearly. No knowledge the Handbook existed, I found by accident. It contains essential information not mentioned unless specific questions asked. Need to be very savvy employee, to think of these questions during whirlwind interview visit. Interview is indeed whirlwind visit. Recruitment staff good, but there was a period after I accepted offer, where no communication came, and I was beginning to think I imagined it all. Need to establish and maintain contact yourself. They don't seem to have any established routines, but that was 6 years ago.

3.0
17 Sept 2014

Frustrating

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good work/life balance, exceptional co-workers

Cons

Organization as a whole has some great leaders; however, managers with poor employee performance reviews are not held accountable for their poor performance and are often promoted to the next level. There are many departments with a very high turn over ratio and very poor morale.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 360 Reviews

Glassdoor has 384 Gundersen Health System reviews submitted anonymously by Gundersen Health System employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Gundersen Health System is right for you.