employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Google DeepMind

Is this your company?

Google DeepMind Reviews

4.2

87% would recommend to a friend

(244 total reviews)
avatar

Demis Hassabis

86% approve of CEO

85% positive business outlook

Google DeepMind has an employee rating of 4.2 out of 5 stars, based on 244 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an excellent working experience there. The Google DeepMind employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Information Technology industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

244 reviews
1.0
4 May 2022

Leadership needs to learn how to listen.

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Salary and benefit are good. Interesting research happening.

Cons

I chose to join DeepMind instead of taking a professorship and it is one of the greatest regrets of my life. If you are a woman or minority, avoid at all costs. Toxic workplace, shambolic HR, and leadership that absolutely refuses to listen to their staff. They claim to bring together the best of industry and the best of academia but it also has the worst of both: no accountability for harassment or abuse, bullying, massive egos, and covering up bad behaviors with NDAs. I have worked in male dominated spaces for my entire career, but DeepMind takes the cake. There is extremely little diversity, though they're trying to change that, many employees are vocally against these diversity efforts, arguing that they "lower the bar" (whereas every female technical staff I've interacted with there is ridiculously talented, yet still under-leveled compared to their male counterparts). There is also a strong hierarchy amongst the roles, where researchers trump engineers trump non-technical staff. This sets up some really nasty dynamics, and researchers treating others like their 'servants'--especially troubling when most of the gender and racial diversity is to be found in the "underclass" of non-technical staff. There are no feedback mechanisms, leadership lies through their teeth, and refuses any kind of transparency. They will go to great lengths to protect abusive senior employees at the expense of junior employees--the founder, Moose, bullied dozens of his reports whilst HR turned a blind eye for years. There are several new reports of HR failing to act on horrific sexual harassment/assault by senior researchers, just look up the news stories. Instead of committing to do anything about their massive HR failures, however, leadership has continued to deny, waffle and deflect blame. Ultimately, I believe Demis just wants to be a researcher, not a CEO, and seems to be largely uninterested in staff problems. Until leadership actually exerts any effort on this, the toxicity will continue.

2.0
14 Feb 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Access to cool technologies and infrastructure Opportunity to work on exciting projects and to learn a lot. You can meet many interesting, highly educated and quite intelligent people. Pays very well. Lots of perks. Good work life balance if you can avoid being sucked into too many projects. Company was very supportive of its employees since the start of the pandemic. Looks good on CV.

Cons

Highly political. Lots of huge egos hired from the academia (quite a few senior scientists are quite arrogant or have prima donna attitude). Promotion process is opaque and political. A class division between Research Scientists and Research Engineers (despite both often having practically the same skills and education). Strong gender bias in staffing, recruitment and management hierarchy ("boys do research, girls do HR and project management") the company seems unable to fix, despite all the talk about D&I. Too much emphasis on PR and image building, too little self-criticism and humility. Failure of high profile projects is usually swept under the rug. Many projects are being pursued which have little scientific and practical value, just because someone thinks they're cool (or can't come up with better ideas). There's quite a lot of group think within research groups, often because the group leaders (usually university professors) hire their former students or academic co-workers. Cliques are common. Influential managers are often added as coauthors to papers they had very little to do with. Most importantly: the company doesn't know where it's going. Less and less people believe that the hallowed AGI is going to be achieved any time soon. However this is not acknowledged officially. In the absence of clear direction, people are messing around and focus on self-promotion.

5.0
7 Feb 2018

Job for Life

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great people, hard workers, culture is innovative and exciting - but still remains warm. Feels like a massive family. Couldn't be happier.

Cons

It is chaotic to work here, due to growth - but personally, I don't see that as a downside. It's exciting and fun - you never know what's going to happen.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 244 Reviews

Glassdoor has 351 Google DeepMind reviews submitted anonymously by Google DeepMind employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Google DeepMind is right for you.