GIC Reviews

3.1

40% would recommend to a friend

(552 total reviews)
avatar

Lim Chow Kiat

61% approve of CEO

35% positive business outlook

GIC has an employee rating of 3.1 out of 5 stars, based on 552 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The GIC employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Finance industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

552 reviews
1.0
11 Apr 2016

Toxic work culture

Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- The pay isn't bad (as long as you're willing to put up with all the Cons that come along with the job) - Potential to be involved in much larger deals of >$500 million that one many not easily see in smaller companies - Smart, diligent colleagues whom you actually enjoy spending time with even outside of work hours

Cons

- As mentioned by other reviewers, GIC is incredibly bureaucratic. The investment approval process is slow and unnecessarily tedious, resulting in many missed opportunities because by the time we've submitted our first bid for a deal, the seller has already gone to Round 3 of bidding with other potential companies/buyers. - Highly political environment where sucking up to the higher ups is not only recommended, but outright necessary if you want to get promoted. - Lots of duplicative internal reports to be done so you spend a lot less time working on actual deals - The unofficial company motto that employees swear by: "lie low, live long". In other words, management tries to make it appear as if they are progressive and open to voices of dissent but in reality, "the nail that sticks out gets hammered down" is the more applicable maxim at GIC. So if you're going to work here, just lie low and act as a "yes man" to senior management and you'll have a much smoother tenure. - Face time is INCREDIBLY important. As an investment manager here, I have often felt the pressure to stay back until 9pm on a regular basis even when I'm done with work as that's what many colleagues do as well (even though they too are done with the day's work). Suspicions about the importance of face time were confirmed after I overheard the Country Head explain to another senior manager: "I like my seat because I can see the door from here so I know what time people come in and leave the office." Actual work done appears to be less important than how much time you're willing to spend showing face in the office. - Poor work-life balance (you're either on the sending or receiving end of 2am emails and everyone sees this as normal, even when there aren't live deals or any looming deadline for a particular project) - If going on business trips, you are expected to leave on a Sunday and return on a Saturday so that the entire Mon-Fri can be used for meetings. If you fly long haul like I do, you will effectively lose 2 days of the weekend once a month without compensation for the lost time with family. Management doesn't think there's anything wrong with that. - Due to the above, place is terrible if you want to have any amount of work-life balance. - Somewhat hard to leave as you need to give 3 months' notice; just need to plan well in advance and negotiate harder with your next employer about when you can join them. - Pay is good but once you work out the pay given the hours you work as an investment manager (about 90-100 hours a week) you're better off elsewhere. CAVEAT: The above is based on my several years of work experience at the GIC headquarters in Singapore. I get the sense that colleagues in the other offices in the US and the UK enjoy a more relaxed and reasonable working environment. Additional context: I'm about to hand in my resignation so feel I can speak more freely.

1.0
7 Oct 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Very good location Nice office Enough snacks & drinks at the pantry Generous training opportunities Good flexible benefits and amount of leaves

Cons

Workload. One person does a lot of work as colleagues have either left, not renewed or were replaced (errr, rather didn't bother finding a replacement). Then staffs got blamed for not having a proper time management...yeah right. Resources. Yes, teams are understaffed as people leave one after another. Go figure. Management - they only want to meet the deadlines and deliver the projects...at the expense of their staffs. Worked everyday (12++ hours) including weekends for almost a month, and several weekends later, but wasn't offered even a single off-in-lieu. Pity. Pay & appraisals. Contrary to most reviewers here, I don't really consider this to GIC's advantage...unless you haven't worked with other financial institutions or I just didn't get a good offer. Then there's also the recent changes with the compensation package that gives you a higher chance (1/3) of getting 0 bonus. Oh well. Superiority complex. I thought that there's an invisible wall when staffs at lower grade interact with those higher than them. I surely felt this when I was new. In addition, vendors are treated differently here and there is clearly a segregation. Is this a norm? Work-life balance. I mean, there's little to no work-life balance to our team. I honestly regret working at GIC. Too toxic environment. I should have taken the warning signs carefully and left earlier. Perhaps, if I did, my efforts would have been appreciated.

1.0
7 Sept 2018

Motion is not Progress

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Well stocked pantry Modernised offices (though open plan) New policies on sick leave and courses are appreciated There are folks who care deeply about the founding principles of the firm, to safeguard Singapore’s reserves.

Cons

The below points are for corporate services. C-suite and MDs unwilling or unable to address ground concerns on how many major organization changes (people, policy, finance, tech) are hastily/ poorly executed despite the good intents behind those initiatives. Grownswell of discontent and frustration is left unmanaged/ unacknowledged. A facade of normalcy reigns during the multiple opportunities to do so. Despite many visible senior hires over the past year (including a C suite), tech strategy and roadmap has yet to be communicated and shared. The last roadmap was three/ four years ago during a major digital push, and appears to have lost much of its steam. A lot of projects have artificially inflated business value and are positioned as “strategic”, despite a recent push towards cost rigour. No central project planning processes at the enterprise level, which leaves senior managers a lot of creativity in justifying projects and in turn, their continued existence. Often, dissenting opinions are shutdown even before being surfaced to decision makers. For majority of the tech developers starting out in their careers, expect limited technical growth due to lean staff strength and lack of technical coaching. The firm has yet to take a firm stance on insourcing/ outsourcing developers. Teams largely work in silos, so there is not a lot of opportunity to cross cultivate and learn tech skills.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 552 Reviews

Glassdoor has 820 GIC reviews submitted anonymously by GIC employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if GIC is right for you.