Frontdoor Reviews

3.2

52% would recommend to a friend

(186 total reviews)
avatar

Bill Cobb

53% approve of CEO

44% positive business outlook

Frontdoor has an employee rating of 3.2 out of 5 stars, based on 186 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Frontdoor employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Management and consulting industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

186 reviews
1.0
18 Oct 2021

Not worth the emotional toll

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Competitive pay (outside of Memphis) Lots of opportunity to have an impact* Everyone cares about their job and is trying hard CEO seems to genuinely care about doing right by the customer and improving the customer experience They are trying to improve and make it a better place to work, new CDO seems committed to making it a place where people actually want to work (good luck!) There are some really great, kind, smart people working there Recent re-org might help improve some of the issues For example, it might improve how functional groups communicate & they actually demoted a terrible manager so that he’s no longer managing people. 👏 *You might hear that there are “lots of opportunities” that’s true but those opportunities are there because things are so bad and no one has been able to change them…and not for lack of trying.

Cons

1. This is primarily a HOME WARRANTY company. They may not make that 100% clear in the interviews. You will be helping sell home warranties to customers who don’t understand what they’re buying. If you want to understand what you’re up against, look at customer reviews of American Home Shield. Is it the best home warranty company? Yes. But that’s not saying much. 2. There are more white men from Amazon in leadership than there are women in leadership. And they burn out talent the same way Amazon does, but without the same benefits. They tout diversity, but a lot of that comes from the call center, not corporate. It’s a very white, very Southern corporate (head-quartered in Memphis). Out of the 300 people I worked with, about nine were black. And six of those people left in the past year. I got the impression they weren’t set up for success or career growth at all… and that very low percentage does not match the diversity of Memphis. There was no transparency about our diversity. And, they used to sponsor Chic-Fil-A weekly lunches until the pandemic in 2020 🤮 which doesn’t seem LGTBQ -friendly. Although, my coworkers all tried hard to be good allies and a few people were out at work (a low bar in 2021). 3. A new CDO was put above the CTO which hopefully will help the terrible work culture that trickled down from the CTO. But, there are still major players that make it an unpleasant and stressful place to work. The GM makes it his business to micromanage details, which often involves yelling at people. I saw him rudely and undermine people so many times in a condescending way…and he was frequently incorrect. He’s not the only one. Several people have left because they don’t want to get yelled at. 4. HR is spectacularly incompetent. I saw them botch so many things and they are a big part of why it was such a terrible place to work. They are 20 years behind the times relative to employee expectations of company culture . They have poor communication with employees. Plus, there is little to none acknowledgement of hard work and success. 5. Leadership did not fully understand the tech debt and would get very distracted by new ideas while the core business languished. 6. There are a lot of good ol boy stakeholders who have been with the company forever and have no idea how a tech company should work or how quickly things could move. 7. Functional groups, especially outside of product and engineering, have no idea how to collaborate with these areas. There’s a lot of confusion about who owns what and roles I was part of conducting interviews where the hiring manager was actively looking for less experienced people because they’d, “be less likely to realize how dysfunctional this place is and more likely to stay longer.” They thought more experienced people would have a higher turnover rate. That hiring manger was particularly terrible and not every team hires like that, but the sentiment holds true. I think it’s important context that I’m someone who consistently received positive performance reviews and got a promotion. I’m not bitter because I couldn’t keep up. I stayed for a few years and it took a toll…getting out was one of the best things I’ve done. I would say work here only if you need the experience or a foot in the door. Use it as a stepping stone if you don’t have other options.

1.0
29 Jul 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

You can put some new Technology on your resume so later you can find a job at a company that actually knows how to deploy new technology properly! Have been able to work from home due to COVID. Currently we are working from home until at least through December (and they keep pushing back the return date). There are some really good co-workers and mid level managers in this company. The company revenue and finances do not yet appear to have been significantly impacted by Covid-19. It's just as dysfunctional as it was before the pandemic.

Cons

Workaholic culture - Whenever there's a problem, it's declared "an emergency" and everyone is expected to work 24/7. Often, these "emergencies" result from upper management's poor planning, direction, lack of understanding of the complexity of our systems, and sheer incompetence. Our upper management tends to use fear based tactics to drive people to work harder. There is little overall strategy in this company other than "Get it done!!" Then they sacrifice their people to try and fix their mistakes. No matter how hard you work or what crazy systems you are expected to get up and running in their excessively short, arbitrary deadlines... expect to be told that you somehow are not doing enough or did something wrong. The expectations in this company are not realistic. As a result, this place is full of minimally functional software systems that look good on the surface but have many fundamental problems buried within them. Too few people have the time or motivation to build anything right. Upper management has a micromanagement problem. They don't let their engineers solve their problems or advise them of the best solutions. Instead, they just dictate what solution sound good to them after hearing about something for 5 minutes in a meeting... and then they just want yes men to carry it out. This problem goes all the way up to the top. For example, the CTO of this billion dollar company has been known to start telling engineers how to implement the technical details of their jobs if their code ever ends up in front of him. Doesn't he have better things to do, like run a billion dollar company, instead of getting tangled up in the details of one engineers code? Upper management is penny wise and pound foolish. They'd rather say they saved a few thousand bucks on some little detail by making everyone work long into the night than fixing the bigger, systematic issues in this company. The value of developer overtime never factors into their cost equations. If you are promised a generous amount of vacation in your offer letter, assume you will be on call the whole time you are off or just discouraged from taking it at all. Incredibly disorganized organization. Good luck trying to get anything done from someone outside your team, or even trying to figure out who you need to talk to. Expect to be blamed for not meeting a deadline by the upper management who oversee the dysfunctional corporate system. The people who run this company (up to and including the CTO) have no idea how to deploy an incredibly complex IT infrastructure system across an incredibly complex business. Instead of focusing on the big picture of how this system is supposed to work and taking the time to get it right, they get tangled up in too many details and just start telling people to fix whatever problems they find first. They usually aren't aware how their orders will impact many other parts of the system in a negative way or other priorities. Management spends too much time trying to optimize the individual components of the system and not enough time trying to optimize the overall system. They don't know how the pieces go together. Substandard benefits package is lacking some common things that most people would just "expect" to have. Be sure to read and ask about every single benefit you are offered in detail.

2.0
12 May 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

They handled the pandemic really well. They prepared ahead of time and were ready to go remote when it started to spread. New development is done with very modern and desirable technologies.

Cons

It’s a high-pressure environment where I had very little control over my own success. As an example, I once had a service account setup request take 2 weeks, then get locked because it was setup incorrectly and had to start the process over. All the while, I had a director pestering me about deploying to production and not understanding that—without the service account—it wouldn’t work anyway. I eventually had the pleasure of working with a fantastic TPM who knew who to sweet-talk to get such things unstuck, but he moved on and things ground to a halt again. This problem is widespread across the company with no signs of improvement and lately has gotten worse as turnover increased and teams I depend on are increasingly backlogged. The Byzantine bureaucracy could be humorous if it wasn’t combined with surreal deadlines that management imposes. For a large project my team carefully sized the features to provide an estimate. When our manager presented it to his bosses he was scolded because it wasn’t ambitious enough. We were later told, without any consultation, that we would have one third the time estimated to complete the project. This was not an isolated incident. Coming up the elevator a little before 9 one morning, a coworker looked positively haggard and confided that he’d only left the office at 3am to get a little sleep and shower but had to come back in to try to meet a similarly absurd deadline. Deadlines like that are stressful enough, but when every team depends on other teams to get things done and all those teams are under extreme time pressure for their own projects, there’s very little the engineers can do to get ourselves unblocked and keep our projects on track. It’s stressful and crazy-making. As you can imagine, morale in engineering is quite poor. It has been since I first joined, but it was causally hand waved by management for the first year and a half as a temporary symptom of the company changing for the better. Something must’ve happened a month ago because suddenly the CTO acknowledged it and promised focus groups to start addressing it. Now, a month later, no such focus groups have been scheduled and there’s no sign of improvement in sight. Again, I have no visibility into management, but it’s become obvious that they’re not able to improve the problems that are driving employees away.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 186 Reviews

Glassdoor has 212 Frontdoor reviews submitted anonymously by Frontdoor employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Frontdoor is right for you.