employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

European Commission

Is this your company?

European Commission Reviews

4.3

89% would recommend to a friend

(843 total reviews)
avatar

Ursula von der Leyen

76% approve of CEO

68% positive business outlook

European Commission has an employee rating of 4.3 out of 5 stars, based on 843 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an excellent working experience there. The European Commission employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Government and public administration industry (3.6 stars).

Reviews by job title

843 reviews
4.0
17 Jul 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

This is an unbelievably talented and dedicated set of individuals committed to making a team effort. Few days will pass when your colleague's intelligence and skill do not astound you.

Cons

It is the Commission and, therefore, bound by the justifiably strict rules of public service overseen by 28 member states as well as the EU's other institutions. Accordingly, the Commission cannot move quickly. On the other hand, this adds to the quality of the policies it produces.

1.0
25 Sept 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Probably much better, if you were hired pre-2004 or 2014 staff reform under the concours/ as a permanent Eurocrat (so you get all the perks while others on precarious contracts do the work for you). The EU institutions keep going on about human rights, paying people the same for the same amount of work etc. ... but they are doing the EXACT OPPOSITE when it comes to (a) recognizing credentials of the millennial generation (often we have more degrees than the older folks, plus more international experience - which should be good for the EU given that it's supposedly international ...) and (b) paying us at the same level as permanent officials. So in reality, the EC has created a second class of workers that work more than the permanent officials - for less money, fewer benefits and less security. Here's your problem with the EU in a nutshell: Unless you have connections, you will not advance. It's like a modern day feudal system. If you can, stay away ... the EU dream has long died at the hands of corrupt EU officials - just look at where Barroso works now and you get the idea...

Cons

Advancement, hiring or recognition have nothing to do with merit or how hard you work - the only way an EU career works for you, is (a) if you are a political appointee or (b) if you have other networks that help you advance (spouse, parents). If you have an alternative position in your home country - take it! It's not worth working on a temporary contract for the EU, if you have to go back to your country of origin after a few years and have to start all over again (re: networking); plus, only a few industries outside of the EU apparatus care about EU experience (e.g. some international law firms and consultancies; maybe national government agencies). I'm surprised that temporary agents haven't yet started a class action lawsuit, given that they are doing the same work (often MORE work given lazy permanent eurocrats that just wait for retirement) for lower salary and benefits ... I've heard first hand that people can enter without a concours, e.g. as political appointees or spouses, while the rest of us have to go through a never-ending series of tests. Where's the justice in that system? It does not exist.

1.0
9 Dec 2011
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

There is only one reason to work here: salary and benefits are great. Actually there is a drawback to it: people stay for the salary and not because of motivation. Your colleagues will be the type of persons who are just content with that. In other words: certainly not an exciting and creative posse. The younger generation in the Commission is better. Hopefully things will change on some tectonic-movement timescale. I joined motivated by ideas: contribute to Europe, work on strategic policies, support innovation and the society. I found an environment of harassment, in which people are motivated by procedures and not by ideas, in which the ones who make career are the least inspired and knowledgeable, in which self-initiative is impossible, in which merit is obscured by million other issues. The bottom-line: join the EU Comm if you are just satisfied with a huge, non deserved paycheck, and try to sit on your benefits and resist the bullying of your supervisors. Disclaimer: few islands of a different nature exist in the commission. they are very rare.

Cons

- Managers are incompetent. People move between fields and get to work on issues on which they know nothing about - Merit is an unknown concept - Creativity? What is that? - Career is extremely slow. (But if salary means career for you, you'll be happy enough) - Important decisions will not be taken by you - Harassment, bullying are typical So my final words. 1. Does the message "Stay hungry. Stay foolish" mean anything to you? Do not even consider coming here. 2. If you are a dynamic person and still wanna try: try to start in a unit related to what you like. Don't accept compromises. Don't be shy in trying to understand the atmosphere of the unit in which you are interviewed. 3. Are you more of a notary type of person? You just like to be slow, don't mind a little bullying here and there, and think a good salary is enough to make you happy. This may be OK enough for you.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 843 Reviews

Glassdoor has 1,904 European Commission reviews submitted anonymously by European Commission employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if European Commission is right for you.