OOMA Chief Executive Officer Review - Business Sales Field Account Executive ooma Employee Review

5.0
12 Oct 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Thus far my experience as a Field Account Executive for OOMA Office has been unparalleled. I will use this review to provide insider information on the Chief Executive officer of OOMA. The CEO of OOMA is Eric Stang. He has an MBA from eminent Harvard Business School. He diligently emails all employees Investor analysis and company financials every quarter. Not only do the emails keep all employees informed on the status of key stakeholders it also enhances company morale. Another great attribute that Eric possesses is he responds to employee emails. I was pleasantly surprised to receive a reply from Eric. In the past I've emailed the CEO of my former employers and they never responded. Eric does a fantastic job at making all employees feel like equals. I go to sleep at night and I dream of OOMA Office. I wake up in the morning and I can't wait to go to the gym and then visit my Silicon Valley OOMA Office Client Base. I'm empowered to make a difference at OOMA. There are several other Pros to being an OOMA employee, but I wanted to utilize the three C's of writing and keep this Clear, Concise, and Coherent.

Cons

I prefer to have the Monday Morning Meetings in the Silicon Valley HQ. The only challenge is half of my colleagues are East Bay Field Account Executives so we meet in the East Bay Office.

Explore other reviews about ooma

5.0
29 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Super friendly and helpful staff... from HR to Operations to Leadership. Good work life balance, Opportunities for remote or hybrid work,

Cons

Benefits are very solid for a smaller company but not world class.

4.0
29 Jun 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Consistent product strategy, focused teams, leadership is focused on company and employee success, decent internal communication on companywide initiatives or updates, structured/traditional company All Hands meetings, improving stock price, solid product competitive advantages.

Cons

Lots of senior leadership has been with the company for 10-20 years. This can be great for institutional knowledge and consistency but can also create significant blindspots. Modernization of tools, systems and employee expectations can sometimes feel outdated, completely manual or slow. Investment decisions can sometimes feel pennywise but pound foolish. Collaboration between technical and product teams can feel painful.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All