Pros
- Payments always on time. - Support for learning initiatives and clear compensation for development. - General effort to promote physical well-being (though mental health support was lacking)
Cons
- Micromanagement and lack of trust from the CEO — even toward senior specialists, including cases where performance data clearly showed the specialist was doing an excellent job - Use of T-Metric (with screenshot tracking) felt intrusive, especially without separate work equipment - Unrealistic expectation to respond within minutes and tolerate frequent random calls - Work-life balance not just neglected — often openly discouraged - Feedback often delivered in a passive-aggressive or unconstructive way - High performers’ input frequently ignored in top-down decisions - Employee feedback surveys lacked follow-up or visible action - Leadership structure unclear — direct manager vs. final decision-maker often blurred in responsibilities and accountability