Talented team but low morale and constant layoffs - Anonymous employee hims & hers Employee Review

1.0
2 Jul 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Product design team was tight knit and extremely talented. The work was interesting enough to somewhat enjoy sticking around.

Cons

There is no trust from within the company. Employee morale is extremely low. Management does not believe in investing from within and growing skills of employees. Work is dictated from top down, and there is no roadmap, just a loose idea of what you’re working towards. Constant layoffs. Laid off a ton of great designers recently.

Explore other reviews about hims & hers

5.0
15 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Just started seems like a really great place to work

Cons

So far there is nothing bad I can say

2.0
3 Jul 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

High-impact work with exceptional people. Hims gives you the opportunity to solve meaningful operational problems at scale. The pace is fast, the company is growing quickly, and you'll work alongside many talented operators who genuinely care about building something great. If you're someone who likes ambiguity and enjoys creating structure where none exists, you'll find plenty of opportunities to make an impact. There is also significant autonomy if you're willing to own problems and move quickly.

Cons

Decision-making and organizational alignment can lag behind the company's operational ambitions. There were times where ownership between HR, other HR functions, and Operations wasn't clearly defined, making it difficult to fully implement workforce strategies. Strong ideas and data-driven recommendations sometimes struggled to gain traction because priorities shifted or functions weren't aligned. As the organization continues to mature, clearer accountability and stronger cross-functional operating models would improve execution significantly. The HR organization was still maturing. As responsibilities expanded, ownership became increasingly centralized, but execution didn't always keep pace. This created situations where decisions crossed multiple functions without clear accountability, leading to rework, slower execution, and frustration for business partners.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All