Departure from values - Anonymous employee TextUs Employee Review

2.0
30 Oct 2025
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

This company has great PTO and ICs who are really invested in putting out their best work. There are some incredibly bright minds and dedicated employees here who are working tirelessly to help grow TextUs.

Cons

TextUs was at one point a great place to work. The company celebrated core values, regularly engaged in kudos, and hosted fun personal project talks to build camaraderie. All of that was removed because leaders felt like it celebrated “mediocrity.” On the business side processes are constantly changing for each department- causing ICs stress in learning new systems and flows causing bottlenecks. Every IC at TextUs is performing multiple roles and there doesn’t seem to be an end in sight. The entire product team is gone. Leaders are constantly pushed out or burnt out- I don’t think a single leader has lasted longer than 2 years. In recent years lay offs have become a quarterly experience. Coupled with the monthly all hands meetings about saving money on “operating expenses” is a certain slap in the face.

Explore other reviews about TextUs

5.0
6 Feb 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I've worked at TextUs for a year, and its been a wonderful experience so far. Everyone is

Cons

no cons so far here

2.0
17 Dec 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

We have kind, smart people that are doing their best. We hire and support women. It's a tech industry job, fairly simple work, and reasonable compensation. Unlimited PTO. Sales revenue isn't declining.

Cons

Low Morale Publicly, morale appears positive. In private, you hear a very different story. An on-site became a “virtual on-site,” which ultimately became a glorified all-hands. Revenue growth is stagnant. Leadership turnover has been frequent enough to raise a real question: are we struggling to hire effectively, or is something else fundamentally wrong? No Leadership The Product Managers are gone after sustained micromanagement and a bi-directional breakdown in trust. The Engineering team does not believe in the current product vision. The roadmap changes substantially quarter to quarter, preventing meaningful traction. After product leadership became centralized with the CEO, the roadmap increasingly resembles sales and marketing wishcasting instead of a strategy grounded in tradeoffs or execution discipline. No Accountability There is no accountability across design, product, and engineering. In one example, a team worked for nine months to deliver work estimated at six weeks. There was no meaningful review of what went wrong, and no changes followed. This is not a one-off; it is a predictable pattern. The organization routinely fails to ship valuable features on time, while responsibility is deflected rather than owned. The truth is our most significant challenges are self-inflicted. Overall, people shift from building a product to protecting themselves. When Engineering Leadership acknowledged a culture of mediocrity the response was not correction, but reinforcement. Grinding code is normalized. Responsibility is optional. Side-quests are encouraged at the expense of team outcomes.

3
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All