The positive reviews are a sham written by management at Suki (In other words: The culture is truly toxic). - Software Engineer Suki AI Employee Review

1.0
15 Feb 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Look... It pains me to say it, but the company culture at Suki AI is an absolute disaster… And, it’s been that way for a very long time. It comes from the very top and permeates down through the entire company. No one with power has had the guts to solve the problem because it would involve showing the upper most rungs of management the door. Check-in with any former employee for the straight scoop. Actually, check-in with any current employees (except for 2 to 3 people at the top who have been there from the beginning) and I suspect that they will privately tell you how things really are. Why write this review now? Well, let's just say a concerned, former employee recently noticed a few obviously fake reviews pop up here and felt it was important that things come correct: The positive reviews are fabricated. They come from sock puppet accounts (Come on guys, it’s just so transparent) and current employees looking to curry favor with others. Look, don’t fall victim to working for this company. I get it: You like the idea of the company, you want to make the world a better place, you think AI sounds cool… Just stop: Don’t do it. It’s all a fiction. Do not waste your time, and more importantly, don’t risk your sanity.

Cons

- Suki AI is the most toxic workplace I've ever been exposed to. It's truly remarkable. - It is too generous to simply call the company's management immature. A close look at two of the company's leadership reveals that they are both of shockingly poor character and truly devoid of integrity. It's actually quite sad and upsetting given what this company is supposed to be aspiring to in healthcare. If you knew the facts, it would really take the wind out of your sails. - Narcissism and gaslighting are commonplace at Suki AI. - Friction between engineering and product is bound to happen (I see it as something of a time honored tradition in building software)... but I have never seen a company where this friction becomes a full blown "tire fire" on a daily basis. During my time at Suki, the engineers truly despised the company's product lead. It wasn't subtle. It was visceral. The product lead was high on confidence, and very low on competence (the far left of the Dunning-Kruger curve). Pair this Dunning-Kruger effect with rude, condescending behavior and you have an unsolvable problem, and a miserable workplace. - The turnover of really high quality employees at Suki AI speaks volumes. It wasn't short lived. Folks left because the culture was intolerable. A cofounder was pushed out of the company for trying to correct the inexcusable behavior of top level management. He failed and paid the price. Sad. - I can't write anymore... It's just too negative. I think you get the point.

Explore other reviews about Suki AI

5.0
11 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Professional and organized interview process Great onboarding and orientation Team is motivated, professional, and friendly Culture is team-oriented, genuinely care about your wellbeing

Cons

can't think of any cons

1.0
9 Mar 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Some very smart, hardworking people are buried in the org doing their best with nothing to work with.

Cons

The company has been around long enough to know better, and yet competitors who entered the space years later have managed to build better products, retain better talent, and articulate a clearer vision. That says everything about leadership here. Turnover at the top is constant and chaotic. New leaders cycle in with zero context on the space, no preparation, and no curiosity to learn. Direction is nonexistent. Teams are left to interpret shifting priorities while the roadmap drifts with no explanation. The C-suite exodus is not a rumor — it's a pattern, and it's a red flag that no reorg will fix. Leadership culture is toxic. Yelling at employees — in meetings, over Slack, in front of peers — is treated as normal. It isn't. It's demoralizing and it's why good people keep leaving. Minimal benefits. When employees raise concerns, the response from leadership is dismissive and tone-deaf. The message is clear: people are not a priority here. Lack of investment in employee experience that runs through every other decision made here. If you're comparing Suki to a competitor, go with the competitor.

5
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All