employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Research to Practice

Is this your company?

Don't Bother Working Here - Anonymous employee Research to Practice Employee Review

1.0
5 Jul 2012
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great coworkers, decent benefits, good location

Cons

- CEO walks around with a God complex - CEO/managers are extremely condescending, do not give credit when credit is due, and are quick to throw others under the bus to cover up his/her incompetence and/or lack of awareness on the issue - Company atmosphere is one big blame game - No trust between CEO/managers and employees = all office communication is through email = 100 plus daily emails = an inefficient use of time during the work day = weekend work - Not structured to allow for growth; only pile on more work (plus hours) and call it a "promotion" - Set insanely high expectations, and when met, are often followed by unappreciative or no feedback

Explore other reviews about Research to Practice

5.0
10 Jan 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Everyone I have worked with has been so nice and helpful

Cons

none to note at this time!

1
1.0
1 Oct 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The entire company is remote, so you can work from home

Cons

-No transparency on the inner workings of the company, particularly financial. -Contracts say there is no pharmaceutical marketing, but they prioritize showcasing the drugs of companies who have funded programs. -When someone leaves the company, they don't hire they just pile more work on current employees with no pay increase. -There is pressure to be on call 24/7 and drop everything if the CEO needs something. -There is minimal upward mobility and little room for change or sharing constructive feedback. -Their operations systems are quite poor - no database, just lots of repetitive spreadsheets. -Leadership is very passive aggressive, with no clear communication on agendas/action items/directives for meetings. -The company is run by people who've been in leadership for decades or are part of the founder's family. These individuals get priority in decision making, but do not have the professional development growth trajectory to back it up. -Also the one HR professional also manages the founder's personal properties. Felt like a conflict of interest.

5
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All