The biggest drawback to working here is how disheartening it is to learn that the company does not align their actions with their mission. Instead of increasing access to care for marginalized communities, the decisions they have made are fuelled by capitalist intentions, effectively preying upon communities that have nowhere else to go. As far as I am aware, Freddie is the only PurposeMed subsidiary that still does not financially exploit their target audience. However, they have maintained the position that their marketing for the virtual HIV prevention clinic stick solely to a specific part of the LGBTQ+ community, despite receiving criticism internally and externally about the harm done to the gbMSM community when marketing efforts strictly hypersexualize gay/bisexual men. In addition to this, the lack of femme representation in their marketing suggests that women are not at risk of contracting HIV, despite statistics showing rates of contraction increasing among this population and decreasing in the gbMSM population. The way they market Freddie emphasizes the pre-existing stereotype that HIV is a "gay man's disease," and deters other at-risk populations from getting tested and exploring preventative measures. This could, at worst, be perceived and felt as a homophobic, misogynistic approach. When it comes to the other brands under the PurposeMed umbrella, Frida attempts to increase access to adult ADHD care. In consulting with a psychiatrist, the method of assessment for ADHD used by Frida is reductionist and fails to adequately screen patients for complex comorbidities (OCD, BPD, bipolar type 1/2, etc). While they do screen for anxiety and depression, this is insufficient when prescribing controlled stimulants for patients they will never see in person. Additionally, they possess no mechanism for proving that the individual filling out the screening questionnaires is actually the person getting the assessment and/or receiving treatment. Access to these medications is already difficult for people with ADHD and these practices only serve to further harm this community's ability to access the treatment they need. What they are doing may be legal, but the approach is certainly not ethical and there is no way to know you are supporting this system until you are employed here and engage with the practices yourself. On top of this, they are gouging their patients for subpar assessments and follow-ups. This is a community of people who struggle financially, more than the neurotypical population - if PurposeMed's mission was not to "increase access for the underserved," this would be less of an issue, but the key takeaway here is that this is a company that you'd think you'd be supporting their benevolent mission by working for, only to learn this is distinctly not the case.