The Promise of Great Pay & Opps in exchange of Ever-expanding JD & Lack of Proper Knowledge Transfer - Finance and Accounting Manager Procter & Gamble Employee Review

2.0
6 Jan 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Competitive CompBen Package vs. Industry Friendly and hardworking co-workers Various learning opportunities especially for B1 managers High exposure, high growth roles are available and will nurture your career trajectory and work ethic

Cons

Lacking Knowledge Transfer and Role Ambiguity - It is not uncommon to have roles that are not staffed consistently by a B1 manager for more than a year. This makes knowledge pool and transfer weak and lacking for B1 manager roles. Even your one-up manager may not know the details of your role. Hence, first-time managers who take on these roles are responsible for their own learning and unfortunately, defining what the work should be based on your stakeholders (customers) behavior and current working culture. It takes time to cope and set working systems because of the many compliance/reporting deadlines that you have to meet and eventually pile up. Consequently, this takes a lot out of you personally. WLB is most likely sacrificed. Further, there have been a lot of downsizing for backend roles. This results to 2-1 hiring, where 1 person is hired for 2 roles. Surface-level Exposure over High-Impact - Fame politics is a big thing. High exposure but lower impact employees are more valued than lower exposure but high impact ones. It is recommended by the leadership team that a B1 manager takes on more and more projects regardless of value, speak up during meetings, lead (sometimes excessively) extracurriculars. Sadly, operational excellence may be sacrificed once these high exposure low impact B1 managers are promoted. Live to Work, Not Work to Live - Even technical and administrative roles (Associates below B1) are expected to render overtime to meet business objectives at ALL times. More common than not, sadly. - Much worse as rise up the ranks, less actual work as you go up BUT I personally think that more stress awaits you there since you are met with highly complex, high stakes issues.

Explore other reviews about Procter & Gamble

5.0
23 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

training in in depth, training on job, basic star interview questions good company, stable benefits are somewhat cheap

Cons

training can be a lot, you have about 1-2hr presentations biweekly where you get tested on different aspects of the plant, like steam system, water system, utilities etc, training can last up to 6 months paid once a month, irregular times on call, may have to work weekends depending on machines work long shifts, sometimes up to 16 hours depending on how machines run, expected to be at work by 6am for safety meetings, 5am sometimes depending on the site you work at, expected to stay if machines run poorly can be demanding- most entry level managers are fresh out of college and expected to train and manage individuals who have worked at the company for decades not very easy to change departments, takes a couple of years no matching 401k, they have their own profit sharing thing, if you quit before 3-4 years at the company, you lose the money

3.0
19 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Many intelligent people who are experts in their fields who are willing to help and provide advice (if they have time). Decent benefits and pay.

Cons

I mentioned time because many people are stretched and overworked. Work life balance is pretty bad and shows no signs of improvement. A lot of this can be attributed to near useless management. Every project is treated as absolute maximum priority but can still be dropped at a moment's notice. Work processes are horribly cumbersome and slow. Even small changes require many approvals but there are endless demands to "move faster".

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All