Pros
Only work-from-home. That is the only reason many employees continue working here despite the environment.
Cons
This company is one of the most unstable and toxic workplaces I have experienced. There is no proper management system, no stable HR policy, and no professional work culture. Everything depends on the CEO’s mood, random decisions, and impulse ideas. Policies change whenever management feels like changing them. The CEO heavily interferes in every department despite lacking practical understanding of sales, marketing, operations, and execution. Every week there is a new process, new strategy, new idea, or new “urgent” direction based on random online trends or videos. Employees are never given enough time to properly implement anything before another sudden change is forced on them. This creates confusion, pressure, and complete workflow instability. The company is extremely focused on micromanagement rather than actual performance. They use a tracking tool called Time Doctor which takes screenshots every few minutes, and management openly prioritizes this tracking system more than real employee output or results. It genuinely does not matter if you are a top performer, generating leads consistently, closing deals, or performing better than the rest of the team if Time Doctor screenshots or activity tracking show something management dislikes, that becomes a bigger issue than your actual performance. Employees constantly feel monitored instead of supported. The environment feels more focused on surveillance and control than productivity or employee growth. There are no proper job boundaries. Employees are regularly asked to handle work completely unrelated to their role. Sales employees may be pushed into development-related work, interns are treated like senior experienced staff, and everyone is expected to manage unrealistic responsibilities without training or support. There is almost no proper onboarding or structured training. New employees receive basic KT from another employee and are then expected to immediately deliver results within days or weeks. If performance does not meet unrealistic expectations quickly enough, employees can be removed very fast. The company also tries to reduce expenses at the employee’s cost wherever possible. Employees working from home must bear internet, electricity, backup power, and laptop-related expenses themselves. The company shifted employees permanently to work-from-home after reducing office operations, and then even reduced salaries claiming employees were “saving travel costs.” Salary deductions and sudden rule changes are common. Employees never feel financially secure because management can suddenly introduce new conditions whenever they want. The leave policy is also extremely poor and below normal industry expectations. Employees receive only 9 paid leaves per year, which comes to just 0.75 leave per month, with no proper casual leave structure. For a full-time company, this is unreasonable and shows very little concern for employee well-being or work-life balance. Holiday policies are also handled inconsistently, and many employees feel the system is unfair and unprofessional. Another major issue is the culture of excessive cost-cutting. Even small food or travel reimbursements for client meetings are questioned unnecessarily. Employees feel undervalued, over-monitored, and constantly pressured. The company has extremely high employee turnover. Very few employees stay long-term because of the unstable environment, micromanagement, lack of structure, constant pressure, and management behavior. Many employees stay only because they need a work-from-home setup or personal financial stability. Overall, this company may not be suitable for professionals looking for stability, structured leadership, respectful management, healthy work culture, proper HR policies, or long-term career growth.