- Heavy micromanagement.
- Strong push to appoint developers as “leaders,” yet all decisions are consistently made by the same few people.
- Project “heroes” are created, and favorites are frequently rotated, with these favorites getting most of the credit.
- Significant layoffs have occurred, leading to low expectations for salary increases due to the high internal pressure.
- No clear career growth plan.
- Too many project managers for too few developers. Many managers create boards, hold long meetings (often 50 minutes) just to mediate conversations, and micromanage the work being done.
- Conflicts of interest among some leaders.
- The company has positioned itself as AI-driven, but leadership shows little real effort to learn no-code platforms, opting instead to rely on developers as the more convenient route.