Not a great place for growth - Engineer Northrop Grumman Employee Review

1.0
29 Apr 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

-Product we build here is second to none. -People who work here are great, hardworking and strive for excellence. -Education Fund -Great Benefits

Cons

-Culture is by far the worst thing here. If you don’t have a degree, good luck trying to move up the latter. You are treated like second or third class citizen compared to those with a degrees. -I worked here for 10yrs and within those years I had 22 bosses. The political management side is pretty disgusting, to say the least. They change/rotate managers faster then they give out raises. -All growth opportunities seem to be in-house and they rarely higher externally. Which is not such a bad thing if they gave externally a slight opportunity. -No degree, No growth - so sad, that their vision of excellence is measured by education only* and not experience. Although I have a degree, I see how people who have way more experience to do my job would never get the opportunity to even get considered for it even though they are more qualified to perform it. They need to take a page out of the tech industry (Google, Netflix, Microsoft) which higher regardless of a degree, but look at all aspects of someone’s ability to perform the job, and they do not let a degree automatically disqualify them. This is why they fail in keeping people and have such a fast turnaround of jobs here. Those without degrees get treated like 2nd to 3rd class citizens, and they will never grow once they reach their capacity. -The irony of all this is that most of the managers here only have technical degrees with no business experience or education to help them be managers. This leads to a management style and thinking that is only limited to an engineering mindset. This is by far their downside to helping employees grow and feel they are worth something. They believe that management experience is only 20% and technical experience is 80%. If they would only switch these percentages the business and culture would grow tremendously, and their employees would be managed by someone who knows what they were doing. -If you have a degree you will be treated good, until you hit your capacity, and then they will push you to go get a Masters degree if you want to grow or make more money, regardless of your hard work or experience. I left the company, which was the best decision I have ever made. I now make double of what I would have made if I had stayed and worked towards a Master that I never wanted to get. I now have had the opportunity to grow and be considered into position not because of my degree but because of my experience and hard work. I have never been happier and less tressed then I am now. I work for an great company that sees my potential and not a piece of paper to prove my worth. I have made my new company millions within the span of a year, and I didn’t not need a degree to do that, only the opportunity to prove my worth. I will say that this is a great first company to work for as it will make you appreciate your second one so much more.

Explore other reviews about Northrop Grumman

5.0
29 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Flexible work arrangement, 9/80 schedule, job security

Cons

Low pay, full time on site required for career growth

1.0
11 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Not much pros but talented coworkers.

Cons

I joined expecting a long-term career and initially had a positive experience. Unfortunately, the culture changed significantly after leadership transitions. Micromanagement increased, decision-making became highly centralized, and employee morale steadily declined. Many experienced employees and managers left during my time there, making it difficult to maintain continuity and trust within the organization. The work itself was meaningful, and I had the opportunity to support important projects with talented colleagues. However, recognition, career growth, and employee retention did not appear to receive the same level of attention as process, reporting, and management oversight. My layoff was communicated as unrelated to performance, which was appreciated. However, after years of contribution and institutional knowledge, the overall experience left me feeling that employees were viewed as replaceable rather than valued long-term assets.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All