People absorb the risk here - Anonymous employee Mention Me Employee Review

2.0
3 Feb 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Posting this in case it’s helpful to anyone evaluating working at Mention Me. High performers should be cautious. Mention Me is an environment where risk is pushed downwards, duty of care is extremely weak in practice, and high performers are expected to absorb an ever-increasing workload with little support or protection. I have worked in the company for several years and there were many moments it was genuinely a great place to work. That is no longer the case. There are still talented and diligent employees in the business, but current leadership have rendered the culture rotten. Many remaining employees are exhausted and miserable. A very large proportion of colleagues have been managed out or made redundant. That doesn’t include those who resigned.

Cons

As for my own experience, everyone around me was made redundant and attempts were made to automate large parts of my role and the roles of those around me who left the business. The result was instead a huge increase in workload, pressure and responsibility, culminating in a serious stress-related health incident requiring emergency care. Despite these material changes and the impact it had on me, no sustainable adjustments, redundancy option, or supported exit were offered, leaving resignation as the only realistic way to protect my wellbeing. Candidates should think carefully about whether this is an opportunity that would reflect genuine growth, or short-term output at the expense of people.

Explore other reviews about Mention Me

2.0
8 Jun 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The individuals. The parties and the potential scope

Cons

Working here was a polarising experience for me. While my colleagues were really nice people, the professional environment was deeply dysfunctional. I had to change job to regain my footing and recover my confidence. The company talks big about progressive values but underneath, lies a reality of severe mismanagement and psychological unsafety. A few reviews mentioned gaslighting and I have also experienced this firsthand on numerous occasions. For instance: 1. Leadership would set priorities one day and completely deny them the following day. 2. Management would constantly undermine leaders in front of their peers killing the trust that was needed to run a team. 3. Everything was micromanaged to the 7th degree. From email syntax to presentation slides and execution. My line manager would continusously interrupt me during high-stakes presentations that they had approved the day before. 4. I remember workshops on "active listening” and micro-aggressions when leadership was (in practice) dictatorial. A popular manager would often take up 25 minutes of a 30-minute team workshop before letting anyone else speak. Another time I remember an executive was asked to motivate a struggling team with an inspirational speech but during the speech it became obvious the exec didn't even know who the team was and what they did. 5. Worst of all for me was the forced trauma culture cultivated by senior management who would regularly use work channels to broadcast intense personal tragedies and other deeply private matters which eventually trickled down into everyday business meetings. Coming from the top, this way of running business felt emotionally heavy, draining and manipulative as the staff had to ‘participate’ in trauma-dumping just to be team players.

3
1.0
14 Jun 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Some genuinely talented and hardworking people remain in the business.

Cons

- The CEO’s style feels more like dictatorship than leadership. Decisions are made with little consultation, and differing perspectives are often dismissed rather than considered. - A lack of respect for employees from the CEO has created low morale, disengagement and a culture where people are increasingly reluctant to speak openly. - Strategic priorities change frequently, creating confusion and making execution difficult. - Good people continue to leave, taking valuable knowledge and experience with them. - Trust in the CEO has eroded significantly across the organisation. - The company has enormous potential, but it feels like it is being undermined by poor decision-making and a lack of self-awareness at the top.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All