Hiring people and then finding a way to fire - Anonymous employee Mastercard Employee Review

2.0
14 Jun 2016
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

God company if you are in the right role under a good boss (People matter in Mastercard)

Cons

Hiring peiople seems to be a "hobby" gven the huge profit margin the business earns.....Seniors who have spend 10 plus years in the ssytem seems to run their division like a personal business and find it easy to hire people, take credit for their work, pass the balme for any short comings they have due to personal ego with other peers, force people to resign, .....Nightmare is the only way to define if you work with wrong boss in this place.....highly political.......doesnt care for spending money on hiring and firing...no efforts taken to retain talent......God help sustain this company in the long run under such leaders......

Explore other reviews about Mastercard

5.0
24 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great culture. Stable. Analytical and rewarding if you find the right product.

Cons

Slower career growth. Not as influential

4.0
27 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Mastercard does a great job fostering an inclusive and supportive environment. There are genuinely good people throughout the organization, and leadership often invests in employee engagement through events, recognition, and culture-building initiatives. I enjoyed many of the relationships I built while working there, and there are teams that truly care about collaboration and supporting one another.

Cons

Compensation at the director level did not feel competitive compared to the level of responsibility expected. Career advancement can also be extremely challenging due to how top-heavy the organization is with senior leadership roles. There are a large number of Senior Vice Presidents, sometimes without clear scope or experience aligned to the title, which creates limited room for high-performing employees to grow. At times, it felt like senior leaders were being hired primarily to manage or communicate with other senior leaders, rather than drive meaningful operational impact. In product and go-to-market roles especially, priorities are often heavily driven by funding decisions. It can be frustrating when projects suddenly shift in importance or remain underfunded for long periods of time while awaiting senior leadership review. This sometimes leaves highly talented employees in limbo, unable to move initiatives forward despite strong momentum or market opportunity. The organization can also be very comfortable with the status quo, which creates a slower pace that many employees seem accustomed to. For people who are highly motivated and eager to drive change, it can feel difficult to navigate the number of roadblocks and layers of approval required to move initiatives forward.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All