employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

MGA Entertainment

Is this your company?

MGA is a mixed bag… - Anonymous employee MGA Entertainment Employee Review

2.0
11 Jun 2021
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Reviews on Glassdoor are highly polarized for good reason. MGA has a lot to offer but falls short in so many areas. I will go over the shortcomings in the next section, but MGA isn't as bad as the worst reviews on here paint it to be. The best thing about being a creative at MGA is the lack of excessive layers of management interfering with design. if your manager likes your ideas, you can easily realize your vision with some exceptions. Management knows how to sell product in a challenging market filled with stiff competition. MGA stuffs the channel every year with more product and new brand launches. Honestly, if you're looking for good experience and need to fill your resume and portfolio, MGA isn't a bad place. If you are looking for more salary, benefits and promotions, look elsewhere.

Cons

Leadership: Isaac Larian is a whip-smart business leader but he is not a kind man. He is impatient, out of touch and conflates intense pressure with good leadership. He has built his company from nothing to the fourth largest toy company in the world and he owns it outright. Far be it for me to criticize him in that respect—he knows how to survive and thrive. His company can be better though… Organization: MGA tries to be organized, every couple of years they introduce some new system or process. Ultimately however, no training, or enforcement ever accompanies these directives and they fail or litter our workflow with unused or misunderstood technology and steps that only serve as pitfalls to efficiency. Hong Kong counterparts are overworked and designers have little support or guidance unless their manager knows how to do what they need. Some divisions lack project managers to help everyone keep to schedules set by planning—instead they rely too heavily on their designers to track everything themselves. In general many items and details get missed, making for an extremely sloppy process that is burdened by constant last minute fixes and running changes. Inexperienced designers have to learn quickly how to project manage several items quickly or fail utterly. The pressure can be crushing designers and the reason many choose to leave or are fired. Compensation: Salary and benefits are mediocre and raises…are anemic at best. I have never received so woefully inadequate a raise as I have at MGA. Some people are lucky to receive one in 3 years—when they do…it could be 3%. Inflation is at an alarming 5% in 2021 and the highest merit raise MGA offered its staff (without a promotion) was 3 pitiful percentage points. To add to the lamentable compensation package, the health insurance is mediocre by even US standards (or lack thereof). The 401k is rather weak and laden with fees, there is some match but nothing compared to Mattel. Remote work: It seems like the CEO is personally opposed to remote work—he built this campus to encourage communication and productivity (the last offices were a dump). He is not a trusting sort by any means. While they did allow workers to work remotely during the pandemic, there is pressure to return to the office that many workers are not yet comfortable with. To be sure, when the pandemic is over, there will be little discussion or remote days for employees. Exodus: Lately many talented people have chosen to leave. For many and varying reasons. I suspect the top three reasons will be lack of adequate pay/raises, lack of promotion opportunities and last, the intense pressure to succeed or else culture. The biggest reason to NOT work at MGA: Some companies in the toy industry will not hire you straight out of MGA over fears of lawsuits. Working at MGA, despite its amazing success is something of a scarlet letter for other HRs. MGA needs to rectify that situation so people aren't scared off from taking a job here because they worry they will be untouchable elsewhere.

Explore other reviews about MGA Entertainment

5.0
20 May 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Iconic, category-defining brands. Working on Bratz, L.O.L. Surprise, Little Tikes, Rainbow High, and Miniverse means your work shows up on shelves worldwide and in pop culture, not in a slide deck nobody reads. Founder-led, entrepreneurial culture. Decisions get made fast. You can pitch an idea Monday and be executing on it by Wednesday. Very little of the corporate molasses you see at public CPG or media companies. Real ownership and scope. Even mid-level roles get broad mandates. Senior roles touch IP, partnerships, content, DTC, manufacturing, and operations in the same week. If you want to learn how a vertically integrated toy and entertainment business actually works, there's no better seat. Privately held means long-term thinking. No quarterly earnings call dictating moves. The company can invest in slower-burn bets like new IP, content extensions, and AI infrastructure that a public competitor would kill in budget cycles. Genuine investment in AI and modern tooling. Leadership is actively adopting AI agents, automation, and forward-deployed engineering partners. Not lip service. Real budget and real pilots. Heavyweight IP and licensing relationships. You get exposure to deals with the biggest studios, streamers, and retailers in the world. Amazon, MGM, Walmart, Target, Netflix. Rooms most people don't get into until much later in their careers. Strong benefits package. Medical, dental, vision, and 401K offerings are competitive for the industry. Mission that's easy to care about. It's toys. You're making products that kids love. That's a clearer "why" than most jobs offer.

Cons

None that I can think of.

1.0
11 Mar 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Some free toys if you're lucky.

Cons

The worst bi-polar CEO there is, who rules like a tyrant and is full of hypocrisy about originality when all he does is copy his competitors! C-Level Suite is dysfunctional at best, with no management or leadership skills to save their lives. It's all about who you know there and not what you produce. If you're looking for a meritocracy, it sure ain't here.

3
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All