LinkedOut - Anonymous employee LinkedIn Employee Review

4.0
10 Oct 2023
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Creative Talent, Incredible Culture, Career Transforming Experiences, Meaningful Work, Incredible Benefits

Cons

Tenure is not celebrated by the company as a whole and no measures are taken to offer incentive to reach longer tenure. In 2023 they easily laid off individuals with significant tenure and disbanded teams with little plan for how the work would be absorbed. The impact on remaining employee morale is yet to be fully realized as it became obvious even high performers were expendible. They embodied a remote culture during Covid but have since started forcing return to office and only list jobs as hybrid which forces new talent to live within driving distance of an office and reduces where they can recruit from. While they are now a large corporation, they are still very scrappy in how the approach system architecture documentation. Everything resides within individual employee One Drives or Google Docs. Every new project requires rehashing basic foundational information because documentation is not centralized or structured in a way it can be simply updated and re-used. Minimum viable product deliverables fall short of satisfactory and resources are not retained to improve and iterate. Instead resources are shifted to entirely new features that will also be released in less than satisfactory functionality. Internal teams suffer the most from this approach as the tools they use to support members and customers are even more inefficient than the product features they have to help troubleshoot and fix.

Explore other reviews about LinkedIn

5.0
7 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Benefits, work culture, people, offices

Cons

Roles are dependent on the ROI of the job & location, as the latest layoffs

3.0
21 Feb 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

-Control your schedule -Office environment is great -Teammates are nice and helpful

Cons

-Customer Success metrics lack clear ownership and actionable levers. Many CSMs do not have direct control over the outcomes they are measured against, and success narratives are often based on isolated or non-replicable examples rather than scalable processes. -Microsoft’s increased influence over LinkedIn has led to tighter promotion structures and more limited compensation growth pathways. -Product value within the LTS portfolio is inconsistent. LinkedIn Learning struggles with perceived differentiation and impact, while Recruiter’s market position relies heavily on legacy dominance rather than clear ongoing innovation or customer value expansion. -Metric design and performance management frameworks were created without a strong operational understanding of the CSM role, resulting in accountability for outcomes that CSMs cannot directly influence. -While many CSMs share these concerns, there is limited upward feedback or structured challenge to leadership regarding metric design and role effectiveness, which limits opportunities for meaningful reform. They prefer to lick the boots of senior leaders rather than tell AV and his team how they actually feel and see progress to better, more impactful metrics. For individuals who are comfortable with high call volumes (10+ customer interactions per week) and performance metrics that are influenced significantly by external factors rather than direct role ownership, LinkedIn LTS Customer Success can be a suitable environment.

3
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All