The Bait and Switch on Work Life Balance - Senior Software Engineer LinkedIn Employee Review

1.0
2 Jun 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good food. A lot of time off. Good benefits.

Cons

When Jeff Weiner left the company he took compassionate leadership with him. After Ryan took over we were optimistic for a while, but the next thing you know, people who suck up to their bosses get promoted to senior management, engineers who squeeze the last drop of creativity every day out of themselves get promoted to managers, and now they start squeezing the last drop of creativity every day out of everyone they manage. There is no more compassion in the leadership although they still pretend there is. To be specific: - Work gets scheduled with 5-day work weeks in mind, even though we get many Fridays off. So what do we do? Work on days off to get the work done. Newer engineers are worked to the bone without promotions, refreshes, or any learning opportunities to improve themselves. Senior engineers are occupied too and aren't willing to help guide new members. - Bait and switch. When interviewing candidates, LinkedIn still leads them to believe there's good work-life balance here. But when they enter the company, they're confronted with a completely different reality. - Less pay, but with a good excuses. LinkedIn offers a slightly bigger package than many other companies upfront, but there's typically no annual refreshes. And they think this is okay because there's better "work life balance" (there's not). There are rumors going around about people getting annual refreshes for doing good work. I haven't seen one in person. - The tech stack is very old and poorly documented. You're also not expected to find much help from other engineers. You're on your own. Good luck. - New feature development is pointless. I only use LinkedIn to find jobs. Who cares about other features? Somehow we have hundreds of new features under development at any given time (many of them will be deprecated in a year or two, after their product leads get a promotion). There is no meaning in the work.

Explore other reviews about LinkedIn

5.0
19 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

great company with amazing people involved

Cons

little too small to have industry wide research breakthroughs

3.0
21 Feb 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

-Control your schedule -Office environment is great -Teammates are nice and helpful

Cons

-Customer Success metrics lack clear ownership and actionable levers. Many CSMs do not have direct control over the outcomes they are measured against, and success narratives are often based on isolated or non-replicable examples rather than scalable processes. -Microsoft’s increased influence over LinkedIn has led to tighter promotion structures and more limited compensation growth pathways. -Product value within the LTS portfolio is inconsistent. LinkedIn Learning struggles with perceived differentiation and impact, while Recruiter’s market position relies heavily on legacy dominance rather than clear ongoing innovation or customer value expansion. -Metric design and performance management frameworks were created without a strong operational understanding of the CSM role, resulting in accountability for outcomes that CSMs cannot directly influence. -While many CSMs share these concerns, there is limited upward feedback or structured challenge to leadership regarding metric design and role effectiveness, which limits opportunities for meaningful reform. They prefer to lick the boots of senior leaders rather than tell AV and his team how they actually feel and see progress to better, more impactful metrics. For individuals who are comfortable with high call volumes (10+ customer interactions per week) and performance metrics that are influenced significantly by external factors rather than direct role ownership, LinkedIn LTS Customer Success can be a suitable environment.

3
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All