Unless you are starving... - Distribution Designer Leidos Employee Review

1.0
14 Sept 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Work from home all the time.

Cons

They are only focused on numbers and don't account for issues that arise in designs or difficulties. It doesn't matter what happened, you better get your numbers which usually will take 60 hours to get. They micromanage. You have no personal life at all because you are always working to keep them happy. You will never meet their goals in 40 hours unless things magically fall into place. They always accuse all staff of stealing time from them. They also may hire you hourly but they change you to salary without even telling you, so all those extra hours to meet goals you aren't getting paid for. It's awful and if you aren't going to starve to death than I wouldn't even take their call. All employees are unhappy and have poor morale (we talked about it daily). Don't loose your personal life. I am at another job doing the same work for the same client now and it's night and day difference. The company I went to after Leidos actually verified my concerns that Leidos works you to death. There's other engineering jobs so take those and steer clear of hell.

Explore other reviews about Leidos

5.0
7 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Large companies. Willingness to work with you.

Cons

Low paying. No hybrid opportunity

3.0
27 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Leidos provides opportunities to work on complex government programs with meaningful technical challenges. Depending on the contract and team, there can be exposure to cloud infrastructure, cybersecurity, systems engineering, networking, and mission-focused work that is difficult to find elsewhere. The company also has a large footprint, so there may be internal opportunities for people who are able to navigate the organization.

Cons

My experience was that the quality of management varied significantly by program. Communication around expectations, roles, and priorities was often inconsistent, and decisions that affected employees were not always explained clearly or handled in a transparent way. Work-life balance also depended heavily on local management. Flexibility that existed in practice could be changed quickly, and employees were sometimes left trying to reconcile changing expectations with existing workloads and personal obligations. In my view, the company would benefit from stronger oversight of program-level management decisions, especially where employee responsibilities, workplace flexibility, and performance feedback are concerned. I also found that technical decision-making was sometimes driven more by schedule pressure than by sound engineering judgment. On complex government programs, that can create unnecessary risk and frustration for employees who are trying to do things correctly.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All