Decent but can be Much Better - Engineering Technologist Leidos Employee Review

3.0
25 Aug 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Flexible schedule and work environment. OK benefits. Values automation and guides to help the team. Flexibility if you want to transfer to a similar group of work for switching things up.

Cons

In the utilities department, pay is smaller. Highly focused on numbers and not accounting for how lengthy or difficult jobs can be. Annual raises are 3%, even if you challenge the managers in a professional way. You would either have to bump up to a lead or supervisor role to see an impactful salary increase or throw your off-work life away. Decline offers where you get bounced around from group to group of possible, it is much harder to get proper annual raises this way. Also if you have a bachelor's degree that isn't Engineering specifically, you are considered an Engineering Technologist and will receive the same title and pay as if you had an Associates degree.

Explore other reviews about Leidos

5.0
29 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

6% 401K Match and 10% Discount for Employee Stock Purchase Program

Cons

No cons to say at this time

3.0
27 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Leidos provides opportunities to work on complex government programs with meaningful technical challenges. Depending on the contract and team, there can be exposure to cloud infrastructure, cybersecurity, systems engineering, networking, and mission-focused work that is difficult to find elsewhere. The company also has a large footprint, so there may be internal opportunities for people who are able to navigate the organization.

Cons

My experience was that the quality of management varied significantly by program. Communication around expectations, roles, and priorities was often inconsistent, and decisions that affected employees were not always explained clearly or handled in a transparent way. Work-life balance also depended heavily on local management. Flexibility that existed in practice could be changed quickly, and employees were sometimes left trying to reconcile changing expectations with existing workloads and personal obligations. In my view, the company would benefit from stronger oversight of program-level management decisions, especially where employee responsibilities, workplace flexibility, and performance feedback are concerned. I also found that technical decision-making was sometimes driven more by schedule pressure than by sound engineering judgment. On complex government programs, that can create unnecessary risk and frustration for employees who are trying to do things correctly.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All